We noticed you're browsing in private or incognito mode.

To continue reading this article, please exit incognito mode or log in.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe now for unlimited access to online articles.

Satellite capture of Hurricane Harvey
  • NASA/NOAA GOES Project
  • Sustainable Energy

    Designers are reinventing hurricane maps for an era of extreme weather

    As climate dangers rise, researchers are testing new ways of communicating clearly about uncertainty.

    Take a look at this map from the National Hurricane Center (NHC):  

    hurricane map
    National Hurricane Center

    Without being told how to interpret it, what do you think it says?

    It looks as if the hurricane will grow into a monster storm that will swallow every space from Washington to Toronto to Boston. But … that’s far from the correct interpretation. What this map actually shows is a range of possible paths that a storm (in this case, 2012’s Superstorm Sandy) might take over the next five days. The white shaded region projects one to three days out; the dotted region projects four to five days out. The black and white circles along the center line of each region indicate the most likely path for the eye of the storm, and the letters labeling the circles indicate whether the storm is a tropical storm (S) or a hurricane (H).

    All this information combined makes up a “cone of uncertainty” and represents a 67% confidence level for where the storm might actually go. In other words, there’s only a 2 in 3 chance that it will actually end up within the boundaries drawn.

    If you didn’t get that from the map, you are not alone. And that can be a serious problem if you’re trying to decide whether to evacuate a given area.

    Uncertainty is a part of the weather forecasting business. Advancements in forecasting have allowed us to improve the accuracy of our models and reduce that uncertainty, which led forecasters to predict Sandy’s unusual path and intensification eight days ahead. Despite that progress, the forecasters still produce hard-to-interpret visualizations like the one seen here.


    In recent years, new efforts have emerged to create clearer alternatives.

    There are five common misinterpretations of the “cone of uncertainty,” says Alberto Cairo, a data visualization expert who has been conducting research with his colleagues at the University of Miami to improve hurricane maps.

    First, people assume that the cone delineates the area under threat, and that its boundaries indicate how big the storm will grow. Second, people rarely realize that the cone represents a 67% confidence interval—a detail disclosed within the map’s documentation rather than on the map itself.

    Third, people often believe that the white and dotted regions signify something more than just a division between the days of the forecast. Some, for example, think the dots indicate the area that will be affected by heavy rain.

    Fourth, people don’t understand the difference between watches and warnings, or whether one is more severe. And finally, people don’t know what the letters mean within the black and white circles—again, because an explanation doesn’t appear on the map itself.

    Some of these misinterpretations can be fixed relatively easily, Cairo believes, such as by adding clearer labels and legends and using design techniques that follow standard visualization conventions. Others, he says, will be harder to crack. Humans tend to interpret graphics quite literally, rather than as representations of an abstract idea. Cairo, who is writing a visualization book with a chapter on uncertainty, says this challenge crops up constantly in science communication, not just in hurricane maps.


    Over the years, various researchers and media organizations have tested out new ways of visualizing the potential path of a hurricane. One method that has gained a lot of traction is to visualize each possible path as a separate line in what’s called a “spaghetti graph.”

    Here’s an example of how the Washington Post implemented this technique for Hurricane Irma last year, with the less probable paths detailed in more faded hues:

    Satellite capture of Hurricane Harvey
    Screenshot/Washington Post

    Here’s another implementation from the New York Times:

    spaghetti graph
    Screenshot/New York Times

    Among the redesigns he’s seen, Cairo thinks this is one of the most promising. He intends to study it more with his colleagues as part of their research.

    “We will try to test as many alternatives as possible to see which one or what combination of maps works better for people,” he says. Ultimately, the solution may not even involve showing the hurricane’s trajectory if their research finds that people don’t need that information to make a decision.

    “Because that’s the whole purpose,” he says, “Giving people the information that they need to make a sound decision as to how they need to protect themselves and their families.”

    Tech Obsessive?
    Become an Insider to get the story behind the story — and before anyone else.

    Subscribe today
    Satellite capture of Hurricane Harvey
    hurricane map
    National Hurricane Center
    Satellite capture of Hurricane Harvey
    Screenshot/Washington Post
    spaghetti graph
    Screenshot/New York Times
    More from Sustainable Energy

    Can we sustainably provide food, water, and energy to a growing population during a climate crisis?

    Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to All Access Digital.
    • All Access Digital {! insider.prices.digital !}*

      {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

      The digital magazine, plus unlimited site access, our online archive, and The Download delivered to your email in-box each weekday.

      See details+

      12-month subscription

      Unlimited access to all our daily online news and feature stories

      Digital magazine (6 bi-monthly issues)

      Access to entire PDF magazine archive dating back to 1899

      The Download: newsletter delivery each weekday to your inbox

    You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. This is your last free article this month. for unlimited online access. You've read all your free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for more, or for unlimited online access. for two more free articles, or for unlimited online access.