Observing space rocks from afar is all very well, but sometimes you need to get up close.
The biggest questions in space science—how the solar system formed, how it led to life on Earth, and whether there’s ever been life on other nearby worlds—can really only be answered with direct study of the materials from those worlds. And that means grabbing a sample to study back home on Earth. “You can model only so much,” says Tanja Bosak, a geobiologist at MIT. “The samples help us to test and validate how we believe the universe works.”
The year 2020 proved to be a big one for so-called sample return missions. NASA’s OSIRIS-REx mission successfully touched down on the asteroid Bennu and collected an overflowing amount of material to bring back to Earth. It will begin the journey back in May. In December, Japan’s Hayabusa2 mission finally brought back samples of the asteroid Ryugu. Later that month, China delivered the first new batch of moon rocks in over 45 years.
The most exciting sample return missions are still to come. In just a few weeks the Perseverance Rover, launched last year, will land on Mars to explore the landscape for evidence of ancient (or present) life, which includes drilling and storing samples for return to Earth at a later date. China is expected to pull off another delivery of moon rocks to Earth in 2023 with Chang’e 6. Russia will do the same with Luna 28 in 2027. Both Russia and China are expected to attempt sample returns missions to Mars before the decade is over. Japan’s Martian Moons Exploration (MMX) mission, launching in 2024, will visit the Martian moon Phobos with plans to collect material from the surface and return it to Earth in 2029. China is mulling a sample return mission to the dwarf planet Ceres. And the possible detection of phosphine in Venus’s atmosphere (which is still being confirmed by several groups) has scientists and engineers alike thinking about what a potential mission to the yellow planet might look like.
So what is making this golden age for sample return missions possible? The launches are cheaper, for one, as is the hardware used to build the probes and landers. Instruments like spectrometers, which can identify the presence of different elements and compounds, are smaller and more resilient, and use much less power. The autonomous technology used to navigate these worlds has improved tremendously—OSIRIS-REx in particular benefited from the fact that the natural feature tracking (NFT) system onboard provided real time mapping of the surface to keep the probe safe from Bennu’s hazardous boulders. NFT is poised to help future robotic missions run smoothly and safely, sample return or otherwise.
Engineers are also coming up with more novel ideas for how to actually collect and store these samples. Perseverance is going old-school with a drill kit to gather intact cores of rock from the ground. OSIRIS-REx came up with a pogo stick-like “touch and go” collection system that brought the spacecraft down for a few-second hop off Bennu and used compressed air to waft small rubble into the collection container. Haybausa2 literally shot bullets into Ryugu. MMX will use simple pneumatics to collect sandy material off Phobos.
For a Venus mission, scientists have been considering a spacecraft that can dip into the atmosphere and bottle up some gas. Cryogenics technologies will enable better storage of extraterrestrial volatiles—or frozen elements that can be vaporized. Basically, every world has a unique environment and set of circumstances that dictate the best approach for sample collection, and our technologies are finally at the point where sampling methods that once seemed too difficult or challenging are reasonable to pull off.
These aren’t investigations you can do with just a probe on the ground. There is simply no substitute for the kinds of investigations you can run through laboratory equipment here on Earth. Say we found evidence of DNA on Mars—Perseverance has no way to sequence it, and as of yet there’s no way any Martian probe could be fitted with the necessary equipment to do so. If we wanted to study rock samples to understand the history of Mars’s magnetic field, a rover just doesn’t have the ability to run those sorts of tests.
From paper to practice
So how exactly does a sample return mission go from idea to execution? “For a sample return mission, it's about accessibility to get there and accessibility to come back,” says Richard Binzel, an MIT astronomer and co-investigator of OSIRIS-REx.
Certain destinations like the moon and Mars have always been at the forefront of planetary scientists’ minds, especially as we’ve learned more about the history of water on both bodies. But beyond these places, sample returns are harder to justify.
In Binzel’s view, sample returns are still too difficult to pull off for all but the most important questions. These revolve around the origins of the solar system and of the chemistry that led to life on Earth. “How far back can we go and get a time capsule of the beginning of everything that is the Earth, and us?” he says. “It’s all about volatiles.” In the context of planetary science, this can mean water ice, or nitrogen, carbon dioxide, ammonia, hydrogen, methane, sulfur dioxide—the ingredients for life. If there are no volatiles—and therefore no indication was once habitable or still might be—a sample return mission seems highly unlikely.
Once the target is selected, however, the engineers take over to figure out how best to collect the sample and bring it back. From there, the scientists must simply play the cards they’re dealt with and hope the material that comes back is suitable enough to study.
The payoffs can be huge. Between 1969 and 1972, Apollo astronauts brought back 842 pounds of moon rocks. Over 50 years later, people are still studying them and publishing papers detailing new insights. “We’re reanalyzing and remeasuring and using newly developed techniques to look at the samples, and coming up with new questions,” says Bosak. “It’s the gift that keeps on giving.”
The fact that these samples can be passed down from generation to generation, in which future scientists can use new technologies and insights to narrow down their investigations and pursue questions no one has yet thought of, means there’s a powerful legacy that’s worth going after. When Perseverance descends to Mars and visits Jezero Crater this month, it will be collecting material that scientists on Earth will study for decades—perhaps hundreds of years.
How SpaceX’s massive Starship rocket might unlock the solar system—and beyond
With the first orbital test launch of Starship on the horizon, scientists are dreaming about what it might make possible— from trips to Neptune to planetary defense.
NASA wants to use the sun to power future deep space missions
Solar energy can make space travel more fuel-efficient.
A new NASA telescope is going to look at our galaxy’s most energetic objects
IXPE will peer into black holes and neutron stars in a bid to understand the universe’s many chaotic environments.
Who is Starlink really for?
The boom in LEO satellites will probably change the lives of customers who’ve struggled for high-speed internet—but only if they can afford it.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.