TikTok has now explained what is and isn’t allowed on the app
The news: Video platform TikTok has published a set of new, more detailed guidelines governing which videos will be deleted from the app. It says it will take down videos promoting terrorism, crime, violence, hate speech, or self-harm, for example.
The rules also ban “misleading information” that could cause harm to either an individual or the general public, going further than US competitors like Facebook, which have (controversially) tried to avoid making those sorts of judgments. TikTok also explicitly bans denying the reality of “well-documented and violent events” like the Holocaust, while Facebook permits it.
What’s next: Writing the policies is the easy part—enforcing them is much harder, and TikTok hasn’t provided much detail on how it does that. However, German publication Netzpolitik revealed leaked moderation guidelines at the end of last year, which showed how TikTok algorithmically suppresses certain videos from becoming popular by making them harder for users to find. Controversially, this included videos created by people with disabilities. TikTok also came in for criticism for banning a girl who had posted a video attacking the treatment of Uighur people by the Chinese state.
Plenty of wiggle room: In a blog post published yesterday, TikTok said the global guidelines “are the moderation policies TikTok's regional and country teams localize and implement in accordance with local laws and norms,” which means it can choose what to suppress and what to promote country by country.
Sign up here to our daily newsletter The Download to get your dose of the latest must-read news from the world of emerging tech.
Deep Dive
Tech policy
The US Navy wants swarms of thousands of small drones
Budget documents reveal plans for the Super Swarm project, a way to overwhelm defenses with vast numbers of drones attacking simultaneously.
A wrongfully terminated Chinese-American scientist was just awarded nearly $2 million in damages
"The settlement makes clear that when the government discriminates, it’s going to be held accountable," said Sherry Chen's lawyer.
Inside effective altruism, where the far future counts a lot more than the present
The giving philosophy, which has adopted a focus on the long term, is a conservative project, consolidating decision-making among a small set of technocrats.
The Chinese surveillance state proves that the idea of privacy is more “malleable” than you’d expect
The authors of "Surveillance State" discuss what the West misunderstands about Chinese state control and whether the invasive trajectory of surveillance tech can still be reversed.
Stay connected
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.