Skip to Content

Building a better MIT

Discrimination and power imbalances are rampant in academia and tech. But at MIT, we can do better.

December 27, 2019
Photograph of the president in his office
Photograph of the president in his officeSimon Simard

This fall, in public forums, in private meetings, and through hundreds of emails and comment cards, I heard the unfiltered views of students, staff, postdocs, faculty, trustees, parents, and alumni following the disclosure of Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to MIT. Some of this feedback was very difficult to hear—difficult, but necessary. Much of it must have taken great courage to deliver. All of it was illuminating and helpful.

I heard female faculty members describe persistent inequities for women at MIT, from belittlement to marginalization—experiences that echo the National Academies’ landmark report on how gender harassment harms women’s well-being and their careers. I heard staff describe the challenge of doing their jobs when sharp imbalances of power left them unable to stop harsh, bullying, or abusive behavior from faculty stars, both men and women.

And I will never forget the voices of students, staff, and faculty who spoke about the painful impact on our community of MIT’s engagement with Epstein, including the intense effects on survivors of sexual assault. (If you would benefit from MIT’s resources for survivors, you can find them here.)

As I am learning, one definition of “culture” is “what a community tolerates.” Clearly, certain aspects of our shared culture are not serving us well.

Fortunately, the individual voices I have heard also conveyed a passionate commitment to our community. And they shared compelling ideas for how to create a better MIT—especially by seeking input from a much wider range of student, staff, and faculty voices, and increasing transparency and accountability. Some are also urging us, as a community, to pause—to reconsider MIT’s values, its goals, and its role in the world—and correct any misalignment.

We all know that discrimination, marginalization, and power imbalances exist throughout society and are rampant in academia and tech. But at MIT, we have never settled for being like others.

We are a community of thinkers and builders. We can examine these fractures together, reaffirm the best of our shared values, and rebuild with greater strength to make a better MIT. We need to work to get it right; persevering together through difficulty is something we understand. We work hard here, and the fundamentals of how we treat one another, and how we model that for the next generation of leaders, are as important as any other work we do. Let’s not rest until we create an MIT where every member of our community is treated with dignity and respect.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Geoffrey Hinton tells us why he’s now scared of the tech he helped build

“I have suddenly switched my views on whether these things are going to be more intelligent than us.”

ChatGPT is going to change education, not destroy it

The narrative around cheating students doesn’t tell the whole story. Meet the teachers who think generative AI could actually make learning better.

Meet the people who use Notion to plan their whole lives

The workplace tool’s appeal extends far beyond organizing work projects. Many users find it’s just as useful for managing their free time.

Learning to code isn’t enough

Historically, learn-to-code efforts have provided opportunities for the few, but new efforts are aiming to be inclusive.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.