Skip to Content

“But I Was Only Joking!” Why Facebook Needs an Irony Emoji

The social network’s new Reactions omit the most necessary of signs.
February 24, 2016

Facebook announced Wednesday that it was launching “Facebook Reactions,” which the social networking giant described as “an extension of the Like button, to give you more ways to share your reaction to a post in a quick and easy way.”

According to Sammi Krug, a product manager at Facebook, the company now understands “that there should be more ways to easily and quickly express how something you see in News Feed makes you feel.” That makes sense: who has not seen that a friend’s parent has died but hesitated to hit the “like” button as a show of solidarity, or read something galling and not wished to make any gesture of approval?

Facebook will now offer six options for responding to a post: Like, Love, Haha, Wow, Sad, or Angry. Users can add a reaction, by holding down the Like button on their mobile phones or hovering over the Like button. The little emojis are animated to dance becomingly before they swoop down to punctuate a post.

Notably absent is a Reaction denoting irony. (Facebook already offered a bewildering number of emojis, describing “feelings” ranging from “determined” to “chill,” that users could employ when composing their status. One of the offered feelings is “sarcastic.” But sarcasm—the grumpy person’s wit—is different from irony.) 

Vladimir Nabokov had an idea for an irony symbol long before emoji became ubiquitous.

That’s a pity, because irony on the Internet is the most fleeting and easily misconstrued of responses. Irony requires context to be grasped, and demands a high degree of culture to understand. After all, an ironic utterance means something other than what it literally says, and requires for its function what the 20th century English critic I. A. Richards called “the bringing in of the opposite, the complementary impulse” (Principles of Literary Criticism, 1925).

Imagine the utility of a little Irony sticker! One could drily punctuate one’s own updates with irony symbols, or note for the idiots at the back of the class that another’s post was in fact ironic, or even simply telegraph ironic detachment.

What would such an irony symbol look like? Fortunately, the need for an irony sign is not new, and the question has been pondered and answered. In 1899, the French poet Alcanter de Brahms said that ironists should always use a kind of upside down question mark: “le petit signe flagellateur.” But the novelist Vladimir Nabokov answered the question best, decades before social networks. He suggested the “sly smile” of a horizontal parenthesis.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

It’s time to retire the term “user”

The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

Sam Altman says helpful agents are poised to become AI’s killer function

Open AI’s CEO says we won’t need new hardware or lots more training data to get there.

An AI startup made a hyperrealistic deepfake of me that’s so good it’s scary

Synthesia's new technology is impressive but raises big questions about a world where we increasingly can’t tell what’s real.

Taking AI to the next level in manufacturing

Reducing data, talent, and organizational barriers to achieve scale.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.