2011 TR35 Judges
Ed Boyden*
Leader, Synthetic Neurobiology Group, MIT
Yet-Ming Chiang
Professor of ceramics, MIT
George Church
Professor of genetics, Harvard Medical School
James J. Collins*
Professor of biomedical engineering, Boston University
Stephen H. Friend
CEO, Sage Bionetworks
Javier García-Martínez*
Professor of inorganic chemistry, University of Alicante
Eric Horvitz
Principal researcher, Microsoft Research
Alex Huang*
Director, FREEDM Systems Center, North Carolina State University
Ed Lazowska
Professor of computer science, University of Washington
Johnny Chung Lee*
Rapid evaluator, Google
Nick McKeown
Professor of electrical engineering and computer science, Stanford University
Christopher B. Murray*
Professor of chemistry, materials science, and engineering, University of Pennsylvania
Dipankar Raychaudhuri
Professor of communications, Rutgers University
Chris R. Somerville
Director, Energy Biosciences Institute, University of California, Berkeley
Nimmi Ramanujam*
Associate professor of biomedical engineering, Duke University
John Rogers*
Professor of engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Phillip Sharp
Institute professor, MIT
Bjarne Stroustrup
Professor of computer science, Texas A&M University
Jennifer West*
Professor of bioengineering, Rice University
Jackie Ying*
Director, Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology
Ben Y. Zhao*
Associate professor of computer science, University of California, Santa Barbara
*Past TR100/TR35 honoree
Keep Reading
Most Popular
The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it
Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.
How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language
For decades, coders wrote critical systems in C and C++. Now they turn to Rust.
ChatGPT is about to revolutionize the economy. We need to decide what that looks like.
New large language models will transform many jobs. Whether they will lead to widespread prosperity or not is up to us.
Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?
An approach that promised to democratize design may have done the opposite.
Stay connected
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.