Hello,

We noticed you're browsing in private or incognito mode.

To continue reading this article, please exit incognito mode or log in.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe now for unlimited access to online articles.

Rewriting Life

Screening with Sound

There’s a well-established medical technology that many physicians believe could help catch undiagnosed breast tumors in one-third to one-half of women – yet it’s not being used routinely. It’s ultrasound imaging, a longtime fixture of obstetricians’ offices. Some doctors use ultrasound along with traditional x-ray mammography in breast exams, but the majority have been waiting for clearer evidence of its benefits. And that’s exactly what a key clinical trial now under way in the United States could provide.

At least half of women under 50 and about a third of older women have naturally dense breast tissue, making it harder to distinguish between healthy tissue and questionable masses in mammograms. Ultrasound can get around that problem because the different types of tissue reflect sound waves differently, says Wendie Berg, the leader of the trial and an independent breast-imaging consultant in Lutherville, MD. “Ultrasound is widely available and relatively inexpensive,” she says. “It’s reasonable to consider it for routine screening.”

In past studies involving thousands of women, ultrasound did detect dozens of dangerous cancers missed by mammograms. But the studies didn’t adequately measure the reverse: the number of cancers detected by mammograms but missed by ultrasound.

This story is part of our November 2004 Issue
See the rest of the issue
Subscribe

The new trial will assess 2,808 women at 20 different U.S. and Canadian locations over three years and is designed to count “false negatives” accurately. All participants will get ultrasound exams in addition to their annual mammograms. A final verdict on the two technologies’ effectiveness isn’t expected until 2008.

Oncologists say ultrasound would only be a supplement, not a replacement, for x-ray mammography, since both methods sometimes miss tumors and misidentify healthy tissues as cancerous. But the two together, says Berg, could catch more cancers than mammography alone.

Cut off? Read unlimited articles today.

Become an Insider
Already an Insider? Log in.
More from Rewriting Life

Reprogramming our bodies to make us healthier.

Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Print + All Access Digital.
  • Print + All Access Digital {! insider.prices.print_digital !}*

    {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

    The best of MIT Technology Review in print and online, plus unlimited access to our online archive, an ad-free web experience, discounts to MIT Technology Review events, and The Download delivered to your email in-box each weekday.

    See details+

    12-month subscription

    Unlimited access to all our daily online news and feature stories

    6 bi-monthly issues of print + digital magazine

    10% discount to MIT Technology Review events

    Access to entire PDF magazine archive dating back to 1899

    Ad-free website experience

    The Download: newsletter delivery each weekday to your inbox

    The MIT Technology Review App

/3
You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. This is your last free article this month. for unlimited online access. You've read all your free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for more, or for unlimited online access. for two more free articles, or for unlimited online access.