Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Airline Passenger Privacy Takes Flight

The Department of Homeland Security is at it again. The Transportation Security Administration cancelled its CAPPS II passenger screening program earlier this year due to criticism from privacy advocates and disclosures that contractors secretly got data from major U.S. airlines….
September 23, 2004

The Department of Homeland Security is at it again. The Transportation Security Administration cancelled its CAPPS II passenger screening program earlier this year due to criticism from privacy advocates and disclosures that contractors secretly got data from major U.S. airlines. Now Homeland Security has announced it will order all U.S. airlines to turn over all passenger itineraries from June 2004 to the government for testing of CAPPS II’s successor, Secure Flight. Plenty of press coverage and commentary greeted the announcement yesterday.

Secure Flight program is designed to check airline passenger names against a centralized terrorist watch list–an expanded version of the watch lists that have almost kept passengers such as Sen. Edward Kennedy off flights due to the similarity of their names to those on the lists. The airlines have 30 days to comment on the order (pdf).

TSA claims that privacy is a “key element” in the new approach and released a privacy impact assessment (pdf) that outlines how testing of the program will go forward and how passengers can contest the accuracy of the information being used. Whether such a program will actually increase the security of U.S. airlines–and the extent to which passenger privacy will be safeguarded–are sure to vigorously debated. Keep your eyes peeled.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

How scientists traced a mysterious covid case back to six toilets

When wastewater surveillance turns into a hunt for a single infected individual, the ethics get tricky.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

It’s time to retire the term “user”

The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.