During the 2020 season, teams in the National Football League responded to covid-19 in a variety of ways, with some games played in empty stadiums while other venues welcomed fans with safety protocols in place. A study by MIT engineers has now found that during this early period in the pandemic, those differences had no impact on the number of infections in the stadiums’ local counties.
These results contrast with those of a study last year, in which a group led by the University of Southern Mississippi found “tangible increases” in case numbers in counties where large numbers of fans attended games. But the MIT researchers isolated the specific impact of stadium openings with a statistical method that determines the effect of an “intervention” by constructing a way to imagine the same scenario without that intervention.
To construct a hypothetical stadium-free version of, say, Dallas, where the stadium was open, the team looked for nearby counties with similar preseason patterns of covid-19 and used data from them to calculate the number of cases this “synthetic” county would have had through the season. Then they compared case counts in each synthetic county with those in the nearby “stadium counties” (those supplying more than 10% of fans), which included 13 stadiums that were closed and 16 that stayed open with reduced capacity and measures such as masking and distanced seating.
Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.