From “Machine-Age Politics”: The technological drive in government has broken down historical relations between political units, just as it has changed the linkage between governors and governed. To be sure, the custom of parceling off the world and each country into little areas under separate rule continues unabated. In the United States this habit is responsible for the fierce battle always raging over states’ rights. In general it is responsible for the spirit of nationalism which so often sets the world aflame. But the cable, the railway, the radio, air mail, and their companions of iron and steel are steadily raising new questions respecting political boundaries. How far is ancient sectionalism compatible with the operating requirements of modern technology? Here is a big issue for the future to face.
From “The Pressure of Numbers”: How can human behavior be directed into channels of concern for man to replace parochial group rivalries and hates? Clearly new patterns of thought are needed as never before to meet the crises of our time. Most of the beliefs we hold so strongly are established by accident of birth and what we learn, hit or miss, before we are seven years old. Emotionally charged prejudices are propagated from generation to generation by parental and adult authority and by the use of myths and symbols. The strongest beliefs one holds may bear little relation to the facts and realities of life as related to the common good. Irrational aspects of human behavior—chauvinistic nationalism and racial intolerance—keep us locked in patterns of conduct highly dangerous in the nuclear age, and dangerous in relation to other changes brought about by science.
From “Charting the Way the World Works”: At some level nearly everyone understands how the world works, yet governments do not often operate in accordance with their understanding. While knowing that the world is an interdependent, richly varied system, we act as if it were made up of simple, separate pieces. Knowing that cooperation works better than competition, we continue to compete. Knowing that short-term results often differ from long-term ones, we go for the short-term payoff. Knowing that the environment flows through us with every drink, breath, and meal, we still think of nature as distinct from humanity. The earth is a diverse, abundant planet. However, the assumption that most pervades decision making in our era is scarcity. The reaction is to hoard and try to increase short-term production.
What’s next for AI regulation in 2024?
The coming year is going to see the first sweeping AI laws enter into force, with global efforts to hold tech companies accountable.
Meet the economist who wants the field to account for nature
Gretchen Daily is working to make the environment more of an element in economic decision-making.
Three technology trends shaping 2024’s elections
The biggest story of this year will be elections in the US and all around the globe
Four lessons from 2023 that tell us where AI regulation is going
What we should expect in the coming 12 months in AI policy
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.