MIT Technology Review Subscribe

A group of big banks plans to launch its own digital currency within a year

The utility settlement coin has a boring name. But the project, led by Swiss bank UBS, is one of the most ambitious and most highly anticipated blockchain projects in the works—assuming it really uses a blockchain.

The news: UBS and 13 other financial firms—including major banks in the US, Europe, and Japan—have created a new company to lead the digital currency’s development, reports the Wall Street Journal. The firms have also collectively invested around $63 million in the venture, which aims to let the banks settle cross-border trades faster and more cheaply. The project was first revealed in 2015.

Advertisement

The token: Few technical details have been revealed, but the project supposedly involves building a blockchain-based digital currency. The WSJ describes the token as “both a payment device and a messenger that carries all the  information required to complete a trade.” It would be backed by bank-owned fiat currency held in central bank accounts. Rhomaios Ram, chief executive of the new company, called Fnality International, told WSJ that he believes the currency will be “fully operational” within a year.

This story is only available to subscribers.

Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in
You’ve read all your free stories.

MIT Technology Review provides an intelligent and independent filter for the flood of information about technology.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in

Blockchain what? The companies in charge are working with a blockchain startup called Clearmatics, and they say the utility settlement coin will be blockchain-based. But we don’t really know what that means. It seems that a blockchain or something like it will play a role, but in 2017 the Financial Times reported that it “isn’t really a blockchain project as much as a market infrastructure project.” Besides, many purists would argue that a network controlled by and open only to banks is not really a blockchain anyway, no matter how blockchain-like its underlying technology may be.

Keep up with the fast-moving and sometimes baffling world of cryptocurrencies and blockchains with our twice-weekly newsletter Chain Letter. Subscribe here. It’s free!

This is your last free story.
Sign in Subscribe now

Your daily newsletter about what’s up in emerging technology from MIT Technology Review.

Please, enter a valid email.
Privacy Policy
Submitting...
There was an error submitting the request.
Thanks for signing up!

Our most popular stories

Advertisement