Skip to Content
Tech policy

Facebook still can’t shake hate speech in Myanmar

August 15, 2018

Although the company is working to stop it, hate speech continues to permeate the social network in the country, which is plagued by ethnic violence.

How we got here: Facebook became the primary means of communication in Myanmar around 2013, when SIM card prices dropped sharply and mobile carriers started offering free data for use of the social network. Soon after, the platform also became the easiest way to spread racist and incendiary messages and encourage violence between Buddhists and Rohingya Muslims.

Turning a blind eye: According to Reuters, Facebook ignored years of warnings from researchers and activists about the scale of harm the platform was causing in Myanmar. “It couldn’t have been presented to them more clearly, and they didn’t take the necessary steps,” said David Madden, a tech entrepreneur who worked in the country.

Too little, too late: The company has finally started to take action, but it is still not living up to expectations. Despite claiming progress and hiring numerous Burmese-speaking employees, it still struggles with the language and relies heavily on user reports to find and remove damaging content. As Reuters uncovered, more than 1,000 pieces of such content—including posts, images, and comments—attacking Myanmar Muslims were still up on the site. Some had been posted six years ago.

Deep Dive

Tech policy

The US Navy wants swarms of thousands of small drones

Budget documents reveal plans for the Super Swarm project, a way to overwhelm defenses with vast numbers of drones attacking simultaneously.

Inside effective altruism, where the far future counts a lot more than the present

The giving philosophy, which has adopted a focus on the long term, is a conservative project, consolidating decision-making among a small set of technocrats.

A wrongfully terminated Chinese-American scientist was just awarded nearly $2 million in damages

"The settlement makes clear that when the government discriminates, it’s going to be held accountable," said Sherry Chen's lawyer.

The Chinese surveillance state proves that the idea of privacy is more “malleable” than you’d expect

The authors of "Surveillance State" discuss what the West misunderstands about Chinese state control and whether the invasive trajectory of surveillance tech can still be reversed.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.