Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Atomic Clocks To Measure Earth’s Geoid From The Ground

Satellites give a rough picture of the Earth’s geoid. Now physicists say atomic clock technology is ready to give a better picture from the ground

The Earth’s geoid is the shape the planet would assume if its surface were made of water. Naturally, there’s little dispute over the shape of the geoid over the oceans, where it varies by only 100 metres or so because of variations in the Earth’s subsurface density. 

But over land, the geoid is much more tricky to pin down. Physicists do it by measuring the altitude of satellites as they orbit. They then crunch the data to calculate the shape of a surface that most accurately reproduces the global sea level. They then extrapolate this across  the continents.

But the results have important limitations. First of all, the calculations are intensive and the solutions  can be multivalued so a subjective decision has to be made to choose a particular value.  What’s more, the results have a spatial resolution limited to 400 km or so. 

Over the continents, where there are myriad variations in density in the Earth’s crust and below, that’s not good enough to detect many important geological formations such as fluid reservoirs and so on. 

Today, Ruxandra Bondarescu at the University of Zürich in Switzerland a few pals say there is a better way to do it, or at least, there soon will be, based on atomic clocks..

According to general relativity, clocks at different distances from a massive body should tick at different rates; the closer going more slowly. But the difference is tiny, much smaller than has been possible to measure in detail. Until recently.

In 2010, physicists used this idea to measure a 33 cm change in height between two clocks connected by optical fibre. That’s more the enough detail to get a good idea of the shape of the geoid.

The idea, say Bondarescu and co, is to place one clock at sea level, where it sits at exactly the height of the geoid. The second clock is taken to some point inland, where it is synchronised with the first using a fibre. 

The second clock will then run faster or slower, depending on whether it is above or below the geoid. The change in clock rate reveals exactly how much higher the second clock is above or below the geoid. 

The advantage over satellite methods is first, that it is much more accurate and second that it is a direct measurement of the geoid at that location, rather than an indirect one that must be processed extensively before producing an answer. 

There are disadvantages, of course. The most significant is that atomic clocks with the required accuracy are only available in the laboratory. That’s set to change in the next few years. Various groups are building portable clocks with unprecedented accuracy. 

For example, the European Space Agency is working towards a clock with an accuracy of one part in 10^18 designed to operate in space.  The aim is to test the equivalence principle (if the mission is funded).

Bondarescu and co say this kind of sensitivty will reval all kinds of subsurface detail. In one numerical example, they show that today’s best clocks ought to be able to detect the geoid perturbation caused by a 1.5 km radius sphere with 20% density anomaly buried at a depth of 2 km depth in the Earth’s crust. 

Measuring the geoid using atomic clocks is not a new idea, of course. People have been discussing the possibility for twenty years. The purpose of  this paper by Bondarescu and co so to highlight the fact that atomic clocks accurate enough to do the job are now being seen in capacity and will soon be out in the wild. 

When that happens, we’ll have the capability to map the geoid and the subsurface structures that determine it with unprecedented accuracy.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1209.2889: Geophysical Applicability Of Atomic Clocks: Direct Continental Geoid Mapping

Keep Reading

Most Popular

conceptual illustration showing various women's faces being scanned
conceptual illustration showing various women's faces being scanned

A horrifying new AI app swaps women into porn videos with a click

Deepfake researchers have long feared the day this would arrive.

2021 tech fails concept
2021 tech fails concept

The worst technology of 2021

Face filters, billionaires in space, and home-buying algorithms that overpay all made our annual list of technology gone wrong.

glacier near Brown Station
glacier near Brown Station

The radical intervention that might save the “doomsday” glacier

Researchers are exploring whether building massive berms or unfurling underwater curtains could hold back the warm waters degrading ice sheets.

Professor Gang Chen of MIT
Professor Gang Chen of MIT

In a further blow to the China Initiative, prosecutors move to dismiss a high-profile case

MIT professor Gang Chen was one of the most prominent scientists charged under the China Initiative, a Justice Department effort meant to counter economic espionage and national security threats.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose WongIllustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.