Skip to Content

Blood Biomarker Is Linked with Death

Those with higher levels of a particular molecule were found to be more likely to die of heart disease or cancer in the next dozen years.
August 30, 2011

Older people who had higher than normal levels of a molecule that helps regulate inflammation in their blood were more likely to die within the next 12 years, according to a study of nearly 2,000 people in Sweden.

It’s not yet clear whether measuring this chemical, cathepsin S, could help doctors predict risk of death or disease in individuals. But the findings may renew interest in cathepsin S as a drug target. A number of drugs that inhibit the normal functioning of the molecule are already in development for autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic pain.

The researchers studied two different groups of Swedes, each with an average age of about 70. Individuals were followed for eight to 12 years, during which nearly a quarter died. After controlling for other factors, such as age, weight, blood pressure, medications, and history of disease, cathepsin S levels were still linked to a greater risk of death.

In one of the two groups, those with the highest levels of the molecule had double the risk of dying during this time period than those with the lowest levels. In the second group, those with high levels of cathepsin S were more likely to die of two particular maladies: heart disease and cancer. The research was published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

“It predicts two of the most common causes of death, which is unusual,” says Johan Ärnlöv, a physician and scientist at Uppsala University, who led the study.

The findings follow research in animals suggesting that the molecule plays a role in both the generation of tumors and the buildup of arterial plaque, a sign of heart disease. In addition, a handful of small studies in humans found that those who were obese or had diabetes had higher levels of the molecule. “It has complex roles in the body,” says Ärnlöv. “It seems to be involved in a lot of diseases and with pain or chronic inflammation.”

That doesn’t necessarily mean that cathepsin S will help physicians predict the risk of cardiovascular disease or cancer better than existing tools can. The link to heart disease is modest, Thomas Wang, associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, less than that for blood pressure or cholesterol levels. Researchers still need to determine whether the molecule is tied specifically to these diseases, or is simply a general sign of physiological aging or poor health, he says. Wang was not involved in the research.

“There are lots of things we can measure that are associated with future risk of death, but they are not useful for doctors to measure in the office,” because it remains unclear how these markers can help with treatment, says Wang. If researchers develop successful cathepsin inhibitor drugs, measuring these levels might predict who is most likely to respond.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

A Roomba recorded a woman on the toilet. How did screenshots end up on Facebook?

Robot vacuum companies say your images are safe, but a sprawling global supply chain for data from our devices creates risk.

A startup says it’s begun releasing particles into the atmosphere, in an effort to tweak the climate

Make Sunsets is already attempting to earn revenue for geoengineering, a move likely to provoke widespread criticism.

10 Breakthrough Technologies 2023

Every year, we pick the 10 technologies that matter the most right now. We look for advances that will have a big impact on our lives and break down why they matter.

These exclusive satellite images show that Saudi Arabia’s sci-fi megacity is well underway

Weirdly, any recent work on The Line doesn’t show up on Google Maps. But we got the images anyway.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.