Skip to Content

A Genetic Test for Organ Rejection

Rising levels of donor DNA in recipients’ blood could mean the organ is in danger.
March 29, 2011

A new test could provide a noninvasive way of monitoring heart transplant patients for organ rejection. The test, which relies on DNA sequencing to detect fragments of the donor’s DNA in the recipient’s blood, still needs to be validated in clinical trials. But physicians hope it will ultimately offer an easy way to detect the signs of organ rejection in all types of transplant patients, perhaps earlier than other approaches.

Rejection hurts: A tissue biopsy from a heart transplant patient shows that the donor heart (pink) is being attacked by the patient’s immune cells (purple), indicating that the organ is being rejected.

Organ rejection is still a common problem after a heart transplant—only 50 percent of patients are alive 10 years after the procedure—and transplant recipients must undergo constant monitoring for signs of organ rejection. For people with donor hearts, this typically means an invasive cardiac biopsy weekly for the first few months, then two to three times a year after that. The procedure is uncomfortable, costly, and somewhat risky.

Biopsies detect rejection by analyzing a small piece of tissue from the donor heart for signs that the patient’s immune system is attacking the organ. But in response to an immune attack, some of the cells in the transplanted organ die, releasing DNA into the bloodstream. The new test, published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, detects this DNA in a sample of the patient’s blood.

In the new study, researchers first compared donor and recipient DNA, searching for single letter differences that would distinguish DNA fragments from the two sources. They then designed a sequencing-based test that could detect a genetic profile unique to the donor. Analyzing blood samples collected from 39 transplant patients over several months, they found that rising levels of donor DNA correlated with the biopsy results. “It’s a very sensitive marker,” says Hannah Valantine, a cardiologist at Stanford and one of the researchers on the study. “The ratio of donor DNA remains stable in absence of rejection. But when there is rejection, we see a rise in donor DNA.”

Valantine says she got the idea after reading a paper published by Stanford engineer Stephen Quake in 2008 that described detection of fetal DNA in maternal blood. Quake’s team then did proof-of-concept tests in female patients with male donor hearts to confirm that it was possible to find this DNA.

“The test holds a lot of promise,” says Elaine Reed, director of Transplant and Immunogenetics Testing at the University of California, Los Angeles. Reed was not involved in the study. Because the results are specific to organ rejection, the test might be applicable to other organs as well, she says. For example, liver and kidney transplant patients are monitored using a blood test for an enzyme called creatinine. But rising levels of that enzyme can be linked to different kinds of damage, not just organ rejection, and it indicates that extensive damage has already occurred.

Additional studies are needed to confirm the results and demonstrate that patients benefit from the test; the PNAS study was based on archived tissue samples from previous biopsies. But the team now has funding from the National Institutes of Health to run the test in a set of patients about to undergo both heart and lung transplants. “Lungs may be tricky, because they can be damaged by both rejection and infection,” says Valantine. “It will be interesting to see if we can identify both.”

She also hopes the test will be able to detect rejection earlier than biopsies, which could have major benefits for patients. Treatment for organ rejection includes high doses of steroids and other drugs to suppress the immune system, leaving patients at risk for infection. “Maybe we can avoid high-dose immune suppression with early recognition and early treatment,” says Valantine. In analyzing blood samples from the first day after transplant through rejection and treatment, “we were not only able to detect a rise in donor DNA at the time of rejection, but we saw it rise before actually seeing signs of rejection on the biopsy,” she says.

Some heart transplant patients have already benefited from another type of genetic test (called Allomap) that measures expression levels in the blood of 11 genes related to the recipient’s immune response. According to a large study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the test is highly accurate in predicting patients who are healthy and could safely forgo biopsies. But the meaning of a positive result—or highly active immune system—is less clear. These people might be rejecting the organ or have some other immune issue, and a cardiac biopsy is required to determine which. “I think there could be tremendous value of using both tests,” says Valantine. “We might be able to fully predict who is unlikely to reject and who is likely.”

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Geoffrey Hinton tells us why he’s now scared of the tech he helped build

“I have suddenly switched my views on whether these things are going to be more intelligent than us.”

ChatGPT is going to change education, not destroy it

The narrative around cheating students doesn’t tell the whole story. Meet the teachers who think generative AI could actually make learning better.

Meet the people who use Notion to plan their whole lives

The workplace tool’s appeal extends far beyond organizing work projects. Many users find it’s just as useful for managing their free time.

Learning to code isn’t enough

Historically, learn-to-code efforts have provided opportunities for the few, but new efforts are aiming to be inclusive.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.