Skip to Content

First Observation of Antihelium

The creation of 18 nuclei of antihelium-4 is a milestone in high-energy physics.

One the big questions that trouble cosmologists and particle physicists is the distribution of matter and antimatter in the Universe. It certainly looks is if matter dominates the cosmos but looks can be deceiving. We may just live in a corner of the universe that happens to be dominated by matter.

Today, we find there’s a little extra antimatter in our corner thanks to the work of the STAR collaboration at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider at Brookhaven National Laboratory in the US.

These guys banged together 10^9 gold nuclei at energies of 200 GeV and spotted 18 antinuclei of helium-4 in the ensuing wreckage. That’s an impressive achievement by an standards–at the very least we now know antihelium-4 can exist.

These kinds of impacts create a hot blob of more or less equal numbers of quarks and antiquarks, a so-called quark gluon plasma. This cools down forming various particles and their antiparticles.

Of course, the bigger the antiparticle, the less likely we are to see it. In fact, each extra baryon in an antinucleus makes it 1000 times harder to make. So although positrons first cropped up in 1932, antiprotons and neutrons didn’t appear until 1955 and we had to wait until 1970 for a Russian team to announce the first observation of antihelium-3.

Now, 40 years later, we have antihelium-4. (It seems unlikely that we’ll see the next in line, antilithium-6, any time soon and, in fact, the STAR team admit it cannot be produced with current collider technology.)

What’s important about this observation is that antihelium-4 seems to occur at exactly the rate predicted by thermodynamics. So unless there’s some other mechanism for making it in vastly greater quantities, we’re unlikely to see a naturally occurring version, no matter how hard we look.

So “any observation of antihelium or even heavier antinuclei in space would indicate the existence of a large amount of antimatter elsewhere in the Universe,” say the STAR collaboration.

And, as it turns out, we are intending to look. The Space Shuttle Endeavour, currently scheduled for launch next month, is carrying the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer to the International Space Station for precisely this reason.

Alpha is specially designed to look for particles of antimatter in cosmic rays. If antihelium is made only by known mechanisms, it will be too rare to trouble Alpha. But if the experiment gets even a sniff of antihelium or anything heavier, expect an explosion of interest from cosmologists and particle physicists.

This is one of the few genuinely useful pieces of science that is planned for the space station. Let’s hope it goes smoothly.

Ref: Observation Of The Antimatter Helium-4 Nucleus

You can now follow The Physics arXiv Blog on Twitter

Deep Dive


Our best illustrations of 2022

Our artists’ thought-provoking, playful creations bring our stories to life, often saying more with an image than words ever could.

How CRISPR is making farmed animals bigger, stronger, and healthier

These gene-edited fish, pigs, and other animals could soon be on the menu.

The Download: the Saudi sci-fi megacity, and sleeping babies’ brains

This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. These exclusive satellite images show Saudi Arabia’s sci-fi megacity is well underway In early 2021, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia announced The Line: a “civilizational revolution” that would house up…

10 Breakthrough Technologies 2023

Every year, we pick the 10 technologies that matter the most right now. We look for advances that will have a big impact on our lives and break down why they matter.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.