Since the White House announced in February its new plan for
NASA, canceling the Constellation program and putting a new emphasis on
technology development and commercial providers, the future of the agency has
been a subject of hot debate in the space community. NASA’s top two officials
came to a major conference last week to defend–and debate–the agency’s new
direction.
NASA Administrator, Charles Bolden, speaks at ISDC. Credit: Jeff Foust
“I personally believe the president’s fiscal year 2011
budget and the request that goes with it is good for NASA, because it sets the
agency on a sustainable path that’s tightly linked to our nation’s interests,”
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a dinner speech in Chicago at the International Space Development Conference (ISDC), the annual
conference of the National Space Society (NSS). Bolden went on to say that the
plan is “is the most authentically visionary policy for real human space
exploration” since President John F. Kennedy announced a goal in 1961 of
landing humans on the Moon by the end of the decade.
Advertisement
NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver, who served as
executive director of NSS for several years in the 1990s, also defended the
president’s plan in a luncheon speech at ISDC. “People have made a lot of
rhetorical statements that this plan kills human spaceflight; in fact, it does
the opposite,” she said, noting that Constellation was suffering from cost and
schedule problems identified last year by the Augustine Committee.
This story is only available to subscribers.
Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.
Others at ISDC, though, were skeptical of some elements of the
plan, including the decision to cancel the Ares I rocket that would have been
used to launch the Orion crewed spacecraft. Scott Pace, a former NASA official
who is now director of the Space Policy Institute of George Washington
University, said at the conference it would be wise to retain Ares I as both a
backup for proposed commercial crew providers as well as an investment in
future heavy-lift rockets. Garver, engaging in an impromptu debate with Pace,
disagreed, noting that the funding in the budget proposal for commercial crew
programs “is not nearly enough” to complete Constellation if spent there
instead.
Another critic of NASA’s new direction at ISDC was Robert
Zubrin, president of the advocacy organization The Mars Society. While
President Obama set a goal of a human mission to orbit Mars by the mid-2030s,
that goal is too far in the future for Zubrin. “It basically means that they
don’t have to start working on it while they’re in office,” he said.
At the end of her luncheon speech, Garver said she hoped
that ISDC attendees, including members of the organization she once ran, would help
advocate for the plan as Congress takes up the NASA budget in the coming
months. “The space community should hopefully see that this our time,” she said.
