Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Caffeine Injection Gives Google Search a Boost

The next-generation architecture of Google’s Web search service is bigger, faster, and, according to some, shows more real-time results.
August 11, 2009

Yesterday, Google revealed the next generation of its Web search service, code-named Caffeine.

On the surface, the changes introduced by Caffeine seem mostly cosmetic–rearranging the way that images, video, and news stories are displayed on the landing page, for example. But according to some (admittedly unscientific) early reviews, there are more significant differences under the hood.

For instance, Caffeine is undoubtedly faster than the current Google Search, often coming back with results in about half the time. It also appears to crawl many more pages–sometimes twice as many for a particular keyword. And according to some pundits, Caffeine’s results suggest that it also uses a more complex combination of keywords to rank pages.

These changes will be particularly significant for developers, designers, and SEO experts, who rely on understanding how Google’s search algorithms work to make their websites more findable.

Some observers believe that Caffeine is more focused on real-time search results. This would make sense, given rumors that Facebook and Twitter both plan to introduce real-time search services, but I can’t say I noticed much evidence myself.

It’s tempting to see Caffeine as a response to the success of Microsoft’s fledgling search engine Bing, especially in light of last week’s search deal between Microsoft and Yahoo. But, again, I couldn’t see much similarity between Bing and Caffeine. Even so, for the team behind Bing, I’m sure there’s no bigger compliment than seeing Google trying to improve its search functionality this soon.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

The inside story of how ChatGPT was built from the people who made it

Exclusive conversations that take us behind the scenes of a cultural phenomenon.

How Rust went from a side project to the world’s most-loved programming language

For decades, coders wrote critical systems in C and C++. Now they turn to Rust.

Design thinking was supposed to fix the world. Where did it go wrong?

An approach that promised to democratize design may have done the opposite.

Sam Altman invested $180 million into a company trying to delay death

Can anti-aging breakthroughs add 10 healthy years to the human life span? The CEO of OpenAI is paying to find out.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.