Skip to Content
Uncategorized

The Puzzling Paucity of Knotted Proteins

Knotted proteins may not be as rare as they seem.

Leave a piece of string in your pocket, and the chances are it’ll be tangled and knotted when you take it out. And yet pick a string of amino acids, and the chances are this protein will not be knotted. Out of the 53,000 proteins in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), only 300 are knotted, and most of these are the same protein in different forms. In fact, it’s possible to reduce the total number of different knotted proteins to 17.

Why are knotted proteins so rare?

Today, Martin Lundgren at Uppsala University and his mate Antti Niemi make a tentative suggestion. They point out that biologically active proteins are compact objects, presumably because there is some kind of advantage in being small.

They then calculate the effect that a knot has on the size of a protein and find that knots tend to increase the size of short proteins with fewer than 400 central carbons in their structure. But for proteins with between 400 and 500 central carbon atoms, knots seem to make them more compact.

“The reason why knots are so rare in PDB data would then be partially explained by the fact that until now, the structure of only relatively short proteins have been reliably resolved,” they say.

So the implication is that knotted proteins aren’t rare at all–only undiscovered. That sounds like a challenge.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0906.4950: Knots and Swelling in Protein Folding

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

How scientists traced a mysterious covid case back to six toilets

When wastewater surveillance turns into a hunt for a single infected individual, the ethics get tricky.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

It’s time to retire the term “user”

The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.