Get Ready for Virtual Income Tax
The U.S. taxpayer advocate discusses taxation of virtual booty.
The annual report
from the U.S. taxpayer advocate Nina Olson (published on the IRS website here)
includes a discussion of taxing virtual economies. As Ars Technica points out, the question was first raised
back in 2003. To me, it is a rumbling of much more to come.
For people who
don’t participate in virtual economies, it might seem like a strange idea. Think
about it this way: it’s fun to fight monsters and have a powerful character
and a nice (virtual) house. But how do you get that awesome character and nice
house? Through something that MMO players call “the grind”: repetitive,
boring tasks, like plowing through low-level quests. The grind should sound
familiar to most of us: it’s washing the dishes, doing the laundry, or
shoveling snow from the driveway. Sure, I can do that stuff myself, but I often
wish I could pay someone else to do it. It turns out that in games, just as in real
life, you can.
And so, virtual
goods have real value to players because they represent time spent doing the
grind, or tracking down hard-to-find items. There are sometimes black-market
exchange rates between game currencies and real currencies. While some online
worlds have resisted real-money trading (most famously World of Warcraft), others (like Second Life and Entropia Universe) have used it to attract new players.
This story is only available to subscribers.
Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.
Subscribe now
Already a subscriber?
Sign in
You’ve read all your free stories.
MIT Technology Review provides an
intelligent and independent filter for the
flood of information about technology.
Subscribe now
Already a subscriber?
Sign in
My favorite
example of the weirdness that this can create is from Julian Dibbell’s book Play Money,
which tells the story of the author’s quest to make more money in a year
playing Ultima Online than he ever made in a year of writing.
Toward the end of the book, he calls up the IRS and tries to ask them about his
earnings in the virtual world. The IRS is, of course, clear that any
“real” money a player makes must be taxed, but Dibbell’s question was
about virtual currency, and his inventory of virtual goods. For someone
like him, who could and would sell these things for real money, it seemed that
it would make sense to consider these things part of his assets, and therefore
subject to appreciation, depreciation, and all the other intricacies of tax
law. The problem that Dibbell reveals, which will be important to the IRS one day,
is how to deal with “things” that may or may not have value, depending
on how you look at them.
The question of
virtual economies is filed in Olson’s report under “most serious problems
encountered by taxpayers.” The report notes,
The economic
activity in virtual worlds is significant. As early as 2001, an economist
estimated that time spent in one of the many “virtual worlds”
generated about $3.42 per hour, which represented a gross national product
(GNP) of about $135 million and a per capita GNP of about $2,266–roughly
equivalent to Russia and higher than in many developing countries. Since $3.42
is a decent wage in some developing countries, people in such countries
reportedly spend long hours in a virtual world to acquire virtual property and
create avatars with favorable attributes that the entrepreneur can sell for
real dollars.
The report notes,
however, that tracking virtual transactions would be problematic, and that it
would often be hard to assign them a value.
For
example, how would we value a trade of virtual armor for a virtual sword or the
income from picking up a virtual sword?
I love the fact
that emerging technologies could make it necessary for the IRS to consider the
value of my Crystalline Bio Armour versus that of my Sword of Tonturu in Cthulhu Nation.