Last week Jon Espenschied wrote an article in Computerworld describing 10 significant security risks with today’s smart phones. The article, while more than a bit geeky, makes an important point: today’s smart phones are general-purpose computers and, as such, they are vulnerable to all the same security problems as other general-purpose computers. Specifically:
They may not be running the code that you think they’re running (and that includes viruses, Trojan horses, and the like);
Many of the communications on and off the phone are not properly encrypted, if they are encrypted at all;
If you delete a file on the phone, it can probably be recovered;
It’s easy for a motivated hacker to spy on your phone.
Espenschied’s article makes good, alarming reading, but if anything, it underplays the risks of mobiles. That’s because his article stresses the security problems unique to smart phones but ignores the risks to phones in general.
Back in 2003 I wrote a brief tidbit, “Understanding Cellular Telephone Security and Privacy,” for a human-rights group that I was doing some work with. Instead of stressing the risks specific to smart phones, this document stresses the risks posed to any cell phone.
Five poems about the mind
Work reinvented: Tech will drive the office evolution
As organizations navigate a new world of hybrid work, tech innovation will be crucial for employee connection and collaboration.
I taught myself to lucid dream. You can too.
We still don’t know much about the experience of being aware that you’re dreaming—but a few researchers think it could help us find out more about how the brain works.
Is everything in the world a little bit conscious?
The idea that consciousness is widespread is attractive to many for intellectual and, perhaps, also emotional
reasons. But can it be tested? Surprisingly, perhaps it can.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.