About a month ago one of my students wrote an essay called “Against the iPod Culture,” in which he argued that the iPod poisons the listener by allowing music to become merely background or a soundtrack-to-life. He believes that music ought to be listened to with full attention, or not at all. Moreover, he believes that the iPod reinforces bad habits of not-paying-attention already rampant in our troubled republic. It is a(nother) distraction machine. In a memorable phrase, he said that he had looked into the eyes of iPod users and “found them blank”.
Curiously, during the same week, I was unwrapping my own iPod. Though I began in a frenzy of shuffling, song-switching, and genre-hopping, I have settled down, for the most part, to listening to whole songs at a time, even whole albums (I still call them albums) at a time. While I do use my iPod to provide background to dish-washing, I also use it to listen intently to music I have heard many times before. The iPod seems to me not unlike other digital music technologies: it doesn’t change the nature of my attention, it foments the variety of listening habits I already possessed. I am not convinced by my student’s argument that the iPod is the downfall of civilization, but I’ve been wrong before.
Five poems about the mind
Work reinvented: Tech will drive the office evolution
As organizations navigate a new world of hybrid work, tech innovation will be crucial for employee connection and collaboration.
I taught myself to lucid dream. You can too.
We still don’t know much about the experience of being aware that you’re dreaming—but a few researchers think it could help us find out more about how the brain works.
Is everything in the world a little bit conscious?
The idea that consciousness is widespread is attractive to many for intellectual and, perhaps, also emotional
reasons. But can it be tested? Surprisingly, perhaps it can.
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.