Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Better Biofuels

MIT's Gregory Stephanopoulos is making microbes work harder to make ethanol production more efficient.

By Katherine Bourzac

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Biofuels, such as ethanol made from whole plants -- stalks, leaves, and all -- could have a significant impact on reducing both carbon dioxide emissions and the country's dependence on foreign oil. In theory, the same amount of carbon released when the biofuel is burned in vehicles' engines would be sucked up by the next year's fuel crop. What's more, fermenting bacteria and yeast could make ethanol from agricultural waste and weeds such as switchgrass that could be grown on land unsuitable for food crops.

Despite all their attractive benefits, however, biofuels have not been an economically competitive alternative to fossil fuels in the United States because the cost of the processing needed to break down plant starches is not offset by the amount of ethanol produced in the end. Now a group of researchers led by MIT's Gregory Stephanopoulos, a chemical engineering professor, are working to improve the productivity and robustness of the microbes that convert treated biomass into ethanol. Stephanopoulos has developed a new technology that enables researchers to introduce complex traits into bacteria and yeast -- such as the ability to continuously convert sugar into ethanol -- and hopes the technology will help turn things around for biofuels.

About a year ago, the Department of Energy released a study (large .pdf file) suggesting that the United States could sustainably produce 1.38 billion tons of biomass annually for conversion into fuels. "If all of the sugar from this biomass is utilized, it could supply 40 billion gallons of fuel a year," says Stephanopoulos. Even if the DOE number is inflated, he says, biofuels could make a major difference in the United States, which currently consumes 110 billion gallons of liquid fuel each year.

Stephanopoulos says the best way to begin the process of turning biomass into fuel using microbes is with a simple physical method. Plant matter is chopped up into small pieces that are then treated with enzymes to break down complex molecules like cellulose into simple sugars that microbes can digest. Bacteria or yeast are introduced to the sugar solution, which they convert to ethanol. But the microbes can only convert so much of the sugar, and they have a relatively low ethanol tolerance. Thus, as the amount of ethanol in solution goes up, the microbes slow down.

Stephanopoulos is engineering E. coli and yeast with higher ethanol production and tolerance. Stephanopoulos takes a systems approach to genetic engineering, attempting to take into account networks of reactions in a cell. "The production of ethanol is a property of the whole organism, not the manifestation of a single gene," he says. "When you think about all the things you have to do in order to change many genes at the same time the problem becomes really enormous."

Comments

  • where's the article?
    far too often i see your articles in my RSS feed with NO ACTUAL CONTENT.  please fix!
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (rss user)
    05/02/2006
    Posts:1
  • better biofuels
    whatever happened to MTHF?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (albert pope)
    05/03/2006
    Posts:1
  • Why not extract the alcohol?
    Long ago, I had a teaching assistant in a language course who was an engineering grad student. His thesis was on extracting the alcohol produced by fermentation under vacuum. The volitile alcohol would vaporize quickly and the microbes could continue on their merry fermenting way. Way can this not be done? Why resort to genetic manipulation?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (pixbuf)
    05/03/2006
    Posts:1
    • Continuous Fermentation/Distillation
      Around 1976 I set up to do this (partial pressure, lower temp. azeotrope distillation) and I found the same thing done in the lesser articles section? of "Science" mag. about this time by Berkeley researchers.  Tax credits plug was pulled and interest waned.  The reason I was experimenting was knowledge of dehydrating ethanol by passing through dry starch, which could be dried in the sun (distillation only gives 92% ethanol, max).  This was thirty years ago.  What a memory you have!
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Steve Koelzer)
      05/03/2006
      Posts:1
    • Reflux column under vacuum
      It is probably quite possible to make a vacuum reflux column to remove the alcohol that takes advantage of the lower vapor pressure of water compared with ethanol at a temperature that the yeast can tolerate. A continuous process can be envisioned, as long as there is a way to deal with the other non volatile metabolic waste products of the yeast life cycle which will otherwise accumulate and kill the yeast in much the same way the accumulated alcohol does
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Bill Jackson)
      05/04/2006
      Posts:1
      • RE: Reflux column under vacuum
        While I would like to see the yeast live on forever, and turn all sugars into alcohol, I think a mid-term goal of simply increasing the output would suffice. Would such a system appreciably increase the alcohol claimed from the biomass?
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (John Jones)
        07/19/2006
        Posts:1
  • Biomass potential production estimates.
    I coubt that any estimates of biomass potential cultivation take into account all the wastelands capable of growing switchgrass, etc. Also we have not taken into account the potential for genetic modification of switchgrass, kudzu, willow (salix) etc. Nor have we taken into account the possible canalization of water resources from the Northwest to the Southwest.

    Does anyone have any expertise to contribute in this area?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Ron Wagner)
    05/03/2006
    Posts:1
  • Why not extract the alcohol?
    Long ago, I had a teaching assistant in a language course who was an engineering grad student. His thesis was on extracting the alcohol produced by fermentation under vacuum. The volitile alcohol would vaporize quickly and the microbes could continue on their merry fermenting way. Way can this not be done? Why resort to genetic manipulation?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (pixbuf)
    05/03/2006
    Posts:1
    • Continuous Fermentation/Distillation
      Around 1976 I set up to do this (partial pressure, lower temp. azeotrope distillation) and I found the same thing done in the lesser articles section? of "Science" mag. about this time by Berkeley researchers.  Tax credits plug was pulled and interest waned.  The reason I was experimenting was knowledge of dehydrating ethanol by passing through dry starch, which could be dried in the sun (distillation only gives 92% ethanol, max). This was thirty years ago.  What a memory you have!
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Steve Koelzer)
      05/03/2006
      Posts:1
  • call me at..(305)..
    Call me at (305)-815-1425
    I'll be waiting!!!!!!! GRRR!
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Jessice Tejada)
    05/03/2006
    Posts:1
    • Fermentation
      Is Jessica in a ferment? :)
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Bill Jackson)
      05/04/2006
      Posts:1
  • less the 50% sustainable?
    This article
    http://www.unh.edu/p2/biodiesel/article_alge.html

    claims we could have 100% sustainable biodiesel from algae farms.  The algae can live off of C02 and run off from farms and such.  Just squeeze it and oils drip out.  No need for complicated fermentation or alcahol extraction.  Plus it has much higher energy density then ethanol so we need fewer gallons to supply all our energy needs.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    zifos
    04/10/2007
    Posts:11
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Prescription: Networking
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.