MIT Technology Review Subscribe

Facebook Security Chief: Cybersecurity Pros Need More Empathy to Protect Us

The dangers facing average Internet users are only “getting worse.”
Alex Stamos, Facebook’s chief security officer.

Facebook was arguably the most important battleground for information warfare in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, and its chief security officer says cybersecurity professionals need to do more to protect Internet users from bad actors.

That will require something that’s too often lacking in the security industry: more empathy. “We have a real inability to put ourselves in the shoes of the people we are trying to protect,” Alex Stamos told the audience Wednesday at the Black Hat computer security conference in Las Vegas.

Advertisement

Social media networks, and especially Facebook, which has over two billion users, are now providing the most important forum for public debate. Foreign and domestic political actors all over the world have taken advantage of the access to voters that sites like Facebook and Twitter provide to spread propaganda and political attacks.

This story is only available to subscribers.

Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in
You’ve read all your free stories.

MIT Technology Review provides an intelligent and independent filter for the flood of information about technology.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in

With billions more people set to connect to the Internet in the coming years, it’s the responsibility of companies like Facebook to foresee the problems they may encounter and protect them from abuse of all forms, said Stamos. It ranges from spam to harassment and even exploitation. “Real harm can happen in that category,” he said, and it is an area the security community traditionally neglected.

For example, the vast majority of Facebook account takeovers are due to password reuse. The use of inauthentic accounts to share and amplify misleading attacks was a prominent aspect of the “information operations” the company observed during the election campaign. Stamos helped author a report, published in April, which described how “malicious actors” undermined civil discourse on the network using fake accounts.

Understanding why people fall victim to technically unsophisticated attacks is crucial, said Stamos. He said curtailing abuse online also requires seeing the point of view of law enforcement and governments officials, something that the hacker and security community has traditionally found difficult to do.

Meanwhile, future elections in the U.S. and elsewhere will be just as vulnerable, if not more, to the kind of meddling we saw in 2016. Facebook is developing techniques to help defend against this kind of activity, by adding fact-checking tools and pursuing analytical tools that can spot propaganda operations. That work led to the suspension of 30,000 fake accounts in France just 10 days before the country’s contentious presidential election. It is also sponsoring the Defending Digital Democracy Project, recently launched by the Harvard Kennedy School, whose goal is to create a bipartisan team dedicated to rooting out election cybersecurity issues.

Still, as billions more humans connect, adversaries will find new vulnerabilities, and protecting democracy against online propaganda will likely be a constant struggle. Generally, “things are not getting better” with respect to the dangers people face online, said Stamos. “Things are getting worse.”

This is your last free story.
Sign in Subscribe now

Your daily newsletter about what’s up in emerging technology from MIT Technology Review.

Please, enter a valid email.
Privacy Policy
Submitting...
There was an error submitting the request.
Thanks for signing up!

Our most popular stories

Advertisement