MIT Technology Review Subscribe

Harbingers of Failure

If these customers like your new product, it’s probably doomed.

Diet Crystal Pepsi. Frito Lay Lemonade. Watermelon-flavored Oreos. Through the years, store shelves have been filled with products that turned out to be flops, failures, duds, and losers.

But such products are soon yanked from the shelves, leaving us to wonder who buys these things, anyway.

Advertisement

Now a study in the Journal of Marketing Research answers that question. Amazingly, the same group of consumers tend to purchase all kinds of failed products, flop after flop, Diet Crystal Pepsi after Diet Crystal Pepsi.

This story is only available to subscribers.

Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in
You’ve read all your free stories.

MIT Technology Review provides an intelligent and independent filter for the flood of information about technology.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in

“These ‘harbingers of failure’ have the unusual property that they keep on buying products that are [ultimately] taken from the shelves,” says marketing professor Catherine Tucker.

And these star-crossed consumers can sniff out flop-worthy products of all kinds. “This is a cross-category effect,” she says. “If you’re the kind of person who bought something that really didn’t resonate with the market—say, coffee-­flavored Coca-Cola—then that also means you’re more likely to buy a type of toothpaste or laundry detergent that fails to resonate with the market.”

“It’s not just how many people are buying them,” says marketing professor Duncan Simester. “It’s how many of the right people are buying them and how many of the wrong people aren’t buying them.”

The study evaluates about 77,000 customers who purchased more than 8,800 new products at 111 branches of a U.S. convenience store chain over several years. A product pulled from stores within three years of its introduction was considered a failure; only about 40 percent survived longer.

Tucker, Simester, and colleagues focused on consumers who, at least half the time, purchased products that ultimately failed. For any given product, when the percentage of total sales accounted for by the harbingers increased from 25 to 50 percent, the product’s probability of success decreased by 31 percent. When the harbingers bought a product at least three times, its chances of success fell 56 percent.

Simester suggests that these hapless consumers have a higher “preference for risk” than other buyers. He admits to having once bought a supposedly self-cleaning cat litter box that failed to function. Tucker, for her part, acknowledges that she used to drink Crystal Pepsi: “This paper may be slightly autobiographical.”

This is your last free story.
Sign in Subscribe now

Your daily newsletter about what’s up in emerging technology from MIT Technology Review.

Please, enter a valid email.
Privacy Policy
Submitting...
There was an error submitting the request.
Thanks for signing up!

Our most popular stories

Advertisement