Privacy-Protecting Search Engine Challenges Google
An ultra-private search engine hopes to attract users tired of handing over personal information.
Google, a company with
20,000 employees and $24 billion in revenue in 2009, is being challenged–by a
guy in Philadelphia.
Gabriel Weinberg is the
coder behind Duck
Duck Go. It’s a search engine that is profoundly–some might say
radically–private. Unlike Google, it doesn’t build a user profile for you, store
your IP address, or collect any other information that could ever tie a
particular search to you.
That makes it impossible,
for example, for a future more-evil version of Weinberg (or his company, were
someone to buy it) to exploit that data by selling it to advertisers without
your permission (as Digg, MySpace, Facebook, and others have done). Or for the company to accidentally
make search data public so that someone can connect whole strings of searches
to the individuals who conducted them (as was done with AOL data in 2006). Or for a more intrusive
U.S. or foreign government to successfully subpoena your search history.
This story is only available to subscribers.
Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.
Subscribe now
Already a subscriber?
Sign in
You’ve read all your free stories.
MIT Technology Review provides an
intelligent and independent filter for the
flood of information about technology.
Subscribe now
Already a subscriber?
Sign in
Better yet, as of a few days
ago, Duck Duck Go searches plug a gaping security hole
few users have ever thought of–the fact that every time you conduct a search
on Google, your search terms are passed to the site(s) you click on after
conducting that search.
To understand why that’s
important, Google something you’d rather was kept private, and click on the top
search result. Now the webmaster of that site has both the terms you used to
find that site and your IP address. As the RIAA has illustrated, this is another
way to identify you directly.
Of course, what’s a search
engine worth if it doesn’t give useful results? Surprisingly, considering its
(so far) modest scope, this is an area where Duck Duck Go also shines.
Apparently, one of the forces that motivated Weinberg to build it was the creeping ascendancy of spammy pseudo-content on Google.
Duck Duck Go feels like a more-cultivated version of the web–fast, informative
results without all the dross.
While it has its own web
crawler and web index, Duck Duck Go also pulls results from Microsoft’s Bing
and Yahoo’s BOSS search APIs, so a lot of what you’re getting are results you could
find on those search engines, anyway. What sets DDG apart, however, is the way
those results are parsed, re-ordered, and displayed on a page that feels like
it was built by a designer instead of an ubernerd. In other words, in some ways
it’s a better user experience, and with an array of customizations sure to
please the internet-savvy designer / hacker / open source geek that are sure to
be its early adopters.
Its search rendered friendly
and usable again–and most importantly, totally private. After all, your web
browser has an anonymous / incognito mode–shouldn’t your search engine have
one too?
