The Big Losers in Energy
Several people holding the purse-strings agree that algae, hydrogen vehicles, and carbon capture and storage won’t make money.
There wasn’t much consensus about the most promising energy technologies, but everyone at a panel on the future of energy at the EmTech
conference at MIT this morning seemed to agree that three
energy-related technologies won’t make money, at least not in the
current economic and regulatory environment.
Heading the list of losers is photosynthetic algae–technology that
would use algae to convert sunlight into fuel. Jim Matheson, a general
partner at Flagship Ventures, said “we just don’t believe the
economics.” Although the venture capital firm invests heavily in
bio-energy technology, “we just haven’t gotten very comfortable that
algae is going to come down the cost curve.”
BP also doesn’t like photosynthetic algae. “We don’t think that
[technology] will ever reach the kind of cost or supply that we think
people are prepared to pay,” said David Eyton, the head of research and
technology at BP. His statement was a direct challenge to a main BP
competitor, Exxon-Mobil, which recently announced an investment of $600 million in photosynthetic algae.
This story is only available to subscribers.
Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.
Subscribe now
Already a subscriber?
Sign in
You’ve read all your free stories.
MIT Technology Review provides an
intelligent and independent filter for the
flood of information about technology.
Subscribe now
Already a subscriber?
Sign in
Eyton noted that BP is investing in algae–just not the photosynthetic kind. Some companies are developing technology that use algae to convert sugar, instead of sunlight, into fuel and other products. That’s easier to scale up, since the algae can be far more concentrated.
Hydrogen, at least for vehicles, was also panned. That’s perhaps not surprising given Energy Secretary Steven Chu’s recent comments about hydrogen.
Then again, the car companies have been clamoring for continued
investment in it. Uma Chowdry, senior vice president and chief science
and technology officer at DuPont said the company had killed its
research on hydrogen storage “because it’s very far away.” Eyton said
BP had also killed its investment in hydrogen for transportation.
And finally, technology for capturing and storing carbon dioxide
doesn’t look promising. The technology could be key to reducing carbon
emissions, but Chowdry said, “We can’t figure out how we’re going to
make money at it.” Eyton noted that “it’s tough to make it work, when
nobody’s putting a price on it.”
