Science is an evolving discipline. Various fields are
constantly being born while others are dying away. For example, 20
years ago, quantum computing was a mere twinkle in its founders’ eyes as
was proteomics a mere ten years ago. And in the same time scale,
a large part of chemistry has morphed in nanotechnology.
But how exactly are these fields changing? And what does it tell us
about the evolution of ideas and the changing nature of science?
Now
an answer of sorts is emerging from the work of Mark Herrera at the
University of Maryland and a few buddies. They have been able to
construct a network out of the links between disciplines found in
published papers between 1985 and 2006. They consider two disciplines
to be linked in this network if both fields are mentioned in the same
paper.
They then look for communities within this network and examine how they change over time.
“The
communities we identify map to known scientific fields, and their age
strongly depends on their size, impact and activity,” say the group.
But this is by no means a static picture. Communities regularly
merge and create new groups of ideas. That’s to be expected if the
anecdotal evidence is anything to go by but they find some more
interesting phenomena too.
For example, communities that are more willing to reinvent
themselves tend to be the ones that have most impact per paper. But it
also shows that communities with higher impact per paper tend be
shorter-lived.
The team say their discoveries raise the prospect of being able to
predict how long various communities will survive and the impact they
are likely to have by looking at the current dynamics.
Whether the group has the nerve to publish its predictions is another matter.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0904.1234: Mapping the evolution of Scientific Ideas
Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.