How Distracting are Social Media Tools?
A study shows that tagging articles stops users from actually reading them.
When I was at South
by Southwest last month, I couldn’t help wondering how much of a presentation someone
can really be watching while also paying attention to a Twitter stream and blogging, as most of the audience seemed to be doing. I was the Luddite taking notes on
paper (to save my laptop battery). I also believe that social
media doesn’t always enhance experience–sometimes, it takes you out of the
experience to be had.
So I was interested today when, during one presentation at the CHI
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems in Boston, Raluca
Budiu, a user-experience specialist for the Nielsen Norman Group,
asked the audience whether typing in tags for articles would help them remember key concepts. The answer, according to her research, is no. Users remembered less after typing in tags than
after simply reading an article online.
On the surface, it seems like tags should be helpful, Budiu said,
since they increase a user’s engagement with an article. In
addition to reading, the user considers what tags to give it and enters them. It sounds similar to highlighting key
passages of a textbook, or making notes in the margin. So why should they reduce
recall?
This story is only available to subscribers.
Don’t settle for half the story.
Get paywall-free access to technology news for the here and now.
Subscribe now
Already a subscriber?
Sign in
You’ve read all your free stories.
MIT Technology Review provides an
intelligent and independent filter for the
flood of information about technology.
Subscribe now
Already a subscriber?
Sign in
Budiu found that adding tags cut into the time that each user spent actually reading an article in the first place. In other words, paying attention to
tags came at the cost of paying attention to the text.
Another part of Budiu’s work involves finding ways to reduce
the cost of participation in social media. She investigated a tagging
system designed at the Palo
Alto Research Center called SparTag.us, which lets users click words in an
article to create tags, rather than typing them in at the end. The idea was
that SparTag.us would help users engage more with an article, but at a lower
cost. Budiu found that SparTag.us didn’t reduce recall. In fact, it enhanced a user’s
ability to recognize particular sentences.
I think this points to an important task ahead for social media.
We’ve found plenty of ways it can enhance our lives: When I store articles with
tags using Twine
(a souped-up sematic bookmarking service), I know I can find them again
with a simple search, complete with my notes. However, it’s important to keep
looking for ways to make social media less time consuming. One thing I like
about Twine, to return to the example, is that it often creates its own tags by
analyzing whatever it is I’m bookmarking.
For social media to truly work for us, we need to enhance what it
does right and reduce what it does wrong. It can be an amazing way to navigate an interconnecting Web of concepts and people. On the other
hand, it can be horribly distracting. I’m looking forward to seeing more
research like SparTag.us, which reveals ways to reduce the cost of using these tools.
