Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Nanotube Computing Breakthrough

A method for sorting nanotubes by electronic properties could help make widespread nanotube-based electronics a reality.

By Kevin Bullis

Monday, October 30, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The use of carbon nanotubes in ultrafast computers and other electronic devices has been stymied because batches of the material contain nanotubes with varying electronic properties. One nanotube is semiconducting, while the next is conducting. Now Northwestern University researchers have developed a reliable and potentially practical way to sort through this mess, segregating nanotubes into precisely the types needed for high-performance electronics. The advance could speed progress toward nanotube computers and has many nearer-term applications, including high-definition displays, devices for nanotoxicity testing, and solar cells.

Sorting nanotubes by diameter and electronic type could help lead to nanotube-based computers. In the background of this image is a test tube full of sorted nanotubes. (Credit: Mark Hersam, Northwestern University)

The new process separates metallic and semiconducting nanotubes. It also segregates them by diameter (another important parameter for reliable computer chips) and eliminates contaminants, such as other forms of carbon. While the researchers expected to be able to sort nanotubes by diameter, the sorting by electronic type came as a surprise, says Mark Hersam, materials-science and engineering professor and one of the Northwestern researchers. "We didn't believe it at first," he says.

Carbon nanotubes are appealing candidates for eventually replacing silicon-based computing because of their small size and excellent electronic properties: some are semiconductors--perfect for transistors--and others are metallic conductors and could be useful as wires for connecting transistors. But getting the right electronic type "makes a big, big difference," says Mildred Dresselhaus, professor of physics and electrical engineering at MIT. Placing metallic nanotubes where there should be semiconducting nanotubes would cause the chip to fail.

So although researchers have been able to painstakingly create logic circuits using carbon nanotubes (see "Carbon Nanotube Computers"), the methods employed to sort them are "all pretty tedious," Dresselhaus says, and not something that could be scaled up for manufacturing chips with the millions of transistors needed to compete with today's computers. In addition, past methods have failed to completely separate semiconducting and metallic nanotubes, says Richard Martel, chemistry professor at the University of Montreal. Martel calls the Northwestern researchers' new approach, described this month in the new journal Nature Nanotechnology, "a breakthrough in the field."

The researchers begin by adding surfactants to a batch of nanotubes. The surfactants latch on to the nanotubes, but differences in the nanotubes' size and electronic properties cause the surfactants to assemble in different concentrations and arrangements, which in turn lead to measurable differences in density. These distinct densities can be sorted out using a well-known process called ultra-centrifugation, which involves spinning the materials at ultrafast speeds--up to 64,000 revolutions per minute.

Comments

  • The above article is hyperbole
    That sorting technology is not breakthrough in nanotube computing. It's a chemical refining method. Recently the Chinses hypered a supposed breakthrough in magnetic fusion. It's not what they advertised.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    protn7
    10/30/2006
    Posts:69
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: The above article is hyperbole
      Interesting, this sorting technique is a variation of exactly what has been used for concentrating metallic ores for over a century. Yet a 99% purity level is completely unacceptable for computing. The same for the cumbersome and slow assembly techniques. Still, this could be a time-saver in the research field. I am sure carbon computers are coming, but not for a while.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      kitk
      10/31/2006
      Posts:65
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: The above article is hyperbole
        the last comment lead me to the suggestion that potentially floatation could also be a promissing technology after adjusting the properties of nanotubes by selective adsorption.
        Unfortunately, no information was provided relating to the nature of surfactant combinations used to produce the density differences. I would speculate that because metallic and semiconductor nanotubes should have marked differences in their electronic structure surfactants like LAS with an aromatic moeity might be able to specifically interact with one form of carbon nanotubes. As common in floatation of ores surfactants or other additives with specific interaction might be designed.
        I wondered that no reference was made in the article that there is already a way to sort the nanotubes based on alternating current electrophoresis developed by German researchers in 2003.(http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/sci;301/5631/344)

        Maybe both methods could be combined.

        Kind regards
        T. Sobisch
        http://AppliedColloidsSurfactants.blogspot.com
        http://www.AppliedColloidsSurfactants.info
        Rate this comment: 12345

        sobisch
        10/31/2006
        Posts:1
        • unfair to call hyperbole
          just because someone else has said something that you judge to be excessively enthusiastic-- and I doubt you have reason to say the magnetic fusion is really anything other than what they say it is-- is no reason to accuse the researchers at Northwest of exhuberance.  I offer both teams my heartiest moral support.
          As for the different means the Germans and Northwest teams use, the team at Northwest is wise to have looked for other avenues to the same end.  Each approach can have specific advantages of speed, purity, cost, and other factors.  The technique at Northwest may have advantages in the area of less pollution byproduct, for instance.  Only as the procedures mature can such matters be evaluated.  As an American, I do hope the team here in the US will find their system of great value.
          As for the product not being 100% pure and nanoscale circuits requiring complete purity, it may mean that there is simply a certain percentage of circuits that do not pass QC, much as LCD panels suffered years ago.  They were initially very expensive due to a low percentage of acceptable product, but they were still able to produce good panels. As processes improved,  acceptable yield increased, and costs dropped accordingly.  The same may be true of nanoscale circuits-- QC will determine yield and costs. 
          My own area of interest lies in the use of CNTs for batteries and ultracapacitors.  Costs and energy densities need to improve dramatically for some applications, and Northwest's approach gives hope.  I do not think 100% purity in each batch will be absolutely necessary as it would be in attempting to make CNT-based computing devices.  There is an enormous number of potential apps for nanotubes of every flavor, and not all apps require absolute purity-- very good may be good enough. and therefore patentable and usable.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          billdale
          12/11/2006
          Posts:15
          Avg Rating:
          4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Featured Content
Sponsored by:
White Papers

Twelve ways to reduce costs with SQL Server 2008
Find out how to reduce costs and get more efficient

Download

Total Economic Impact of SQL Server 2008 Upgrade
Forrester reports on increasing productivity and management capabilities

Download 

Achieving Cost and Resource Savings with UC
How Office Communications Server R2 and Exchange Server can make your business smarter and more efficient

Download 

The Compelling Case for Conferencing
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

How Windows Server 2008 R2 Helps Optimize IT and Save you Money
Read how you can improve workload support and find IT efficiencies

Download

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Live Migration
See how Windows Server 2008 R2 and Hyper-V enable virtualization and Live Migration

Download
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.