Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Motorola's Dumb Phone

A new mobile phone that's rather simple bucks the trend toward more complicated, power-hungry devices.

By Kevin Bullis

Thursday, October 26, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Mobile phones in the United States are more power-hungry and complicated than ever. But one of the latest phones from Motorola, aimed primarily at other markets and due out by the end of the year, is just the opposite. Looking for more customers, the company did extensive market research in poor countries. The result: the company's slimmest phone yet, boasting cutting-edge technology that--rather than adding complexity--extends battery life and makes the phone simpler to use.

Motorola hopes to lure customers in emerging markets with new tech and a slick design. (Credit: Motorola)

Called the Motofone, the new device is cheap. But it still retains some of the style of the company's Razr, which can cost many times as much. Research showed that style matters "regardless of income or social status," says Motorola's manager for the phone project, Rafael Colorado, who is himself from one of the target countries, Colombia. The company hopes the design will help win new customers in large emerging markets, such as India, where there isn't yet a "signature product" equivalent to the Razr, says Ryan Reith, a research analyst for the market research firm IDC. Currently, Nokia is doing better than Motorola in these markets, he says. The phone may also appeal to new users in countries such as the United States, he says, or to anyone who just wants a simple phone that works well.

The phone's most distinctive feature is its screen, a high-contrast reflective display using a new technology invented at MIT. Commercialized by E Ink of Cambridge, MA, the display has been described as electronic paper. Like paper, it does not rely on a backlight, as in LCDs, or a constant supply of electricity, as in emissive displays based on organic light-emitting devices. Indeed, it uses no power to display an image--only to change the image on the screen. The image itself is composed of tiny spheres containing nanoscopic black and white particles. Russell Wilcox, E Ink's president and CEO, says the particles are something like tiny bits of ink and paper. Whether the spheres appear black or white depends on the charge of an underlying electrode. A negative electrode repels the negatively charged black particles, forcing them to the top of the sphere, and attracts the positively charged white particles, pulling them to the bottom and out of sight. The result is a black dot. Dots of various shades of gray can be created by changing the charge at different intervals, allowing black and white particles to mix. The display is very easy to see even in full sunlight but uses much less energy than an LCD, Wilcox says.

The display technology has been in development for about 10 years and is starting to find its way into other products, such as the new Sony Reader and a thin, curved watch from Seiko. It is well suited in several ways to a phone designed for poor countries, says Motorola's chief technology officer, Padmasree Warrior. The efficient display was attractive, she says, because, "power is an issue in rural India." The saved power allowed Motorola to use a small, less expensive battery, even though the phone offers eight hours of talk time and 12 days of standby time. According to Colorado, a user could charge the phone by riding a bicycle, a dominant mode of transportation in India. In a bike equipped with an inexpensive dynamo-based system Motorola is also developing, it would take about two hours of biking at a leisurely pace.

Comments

  • Motorola in India
    1.A mobile phone will be a significant investment for a lot of the people this phone targets. These people will look more at "Bang per Buck" than at the absolute cost. It is here that most low cost technologies lose out. People don't not want features like the internet etc. on their phones. They don't want to pay too much for them.
    2.These phones will also compete with grey market imports and second hand phones sourced abroad as well as locally which will be significantly cheaper than anything motorola can sell this phone for and have more features at the same time.
    3.A phone without a backlight and no LED flashlight makes no sense in a country like India, where the mobile phone LCD backlight is frequently used as a flashlight. Nokia were the first to realise the potential of this when they incorporated one into the Nokia 1100.
    4.Are slim phones that popular? More of my friends have fat chunky Nokias (6600 etc.) than slim samsungs and motorolas. Also these phones will have to undertake extremely rough handling and climates, a situation where more material is better.
    5.I personally think that "budget" phones and "budget" computers are more likely to find a market amongst geeks with a thing for such stuff.
    6.What motorola should really be doing is refurbishing old motorola phones and reselling them. This won't cost them much as motorola phones in India have pathetic resale value. I had a motorola C115 on which I lost 80% of the cash in 10 months. Just 2 months later my mother exchanged her 5 year old Nokia 3300 for more.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    potaman
    10/26/2006
    Posts:1
    • Re: Motorola in India
      Its true that in India, the phone backlite is used as a flash light, but its also true that the power in india is also very scarce and people in the rural areas hardly find time to chrge their mobiles. So power efficient model with all the basic communication features with some style is always accepted. If u see, why Nokia 1100 had such a huge market, because of its sleekness, basic capabilities, power efficiency, robustness and the resale  value. If motorola can target these features then its gonna be the next generation phone
      Rate this comment: 12345

      v_pradeep4u
      10/27/2006
      Posts:1
  • This could be a breakthrough
    This type of phone would be ideal for use in the U.S. by those with very low incomes, such as the disabled and elderly.  These people could benefit greatly from an affordable cell phone for emergency use.  The problem has always been finding a service provider with a plan affordable enough for those who must subsist on Social Security benefits alone.  Maybe someone will step up to the plate.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    the_dukeman
    10/30/2006
    Posts:1
  • Finally
    I'm really excited about the Rex iLiad and Sony Reader (whenever that thing finally releases...)  The technology is easy on batteries and it's nice on the eyes. After the color displays come out in 2007 - watch out!  Wonder whether LCDs will be soooo "2008."
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kellyhair
    10/31/2006
    Posts:1
  • robust?
    if you want to use it in rural areas, it must resist water. I have a very old TDMA nokia 6120 cell phone that **is** robust. You can drop it, you can wait a day or two if it's wet and it works again.

    what happens to this wonderful e-ink display in these situations?

    what 99% of the world population need (after safe water) is a cell phone that you can use to talk, to listen, and a battery that longs a month, for US$ 50. That's the future, not embedded cameras, voice recognition, games, calculators and other useless gadgets, IMHO
    Rate this comment: 12345

    shikida
    10/31/2006
    Posts:1
  • Make it available in the US
    I have been hounding our local provider (Verizon)for months for a phone that has an easy-to-read screen, buttons large enough for older people, no camera, no web, long battery life and louder ringers. My parents and in-laws love their cell phones to talk free to the grandkids but every upgrade is a nightmare. There is a large population of people that don't want bell and whistles -- I love my Chocolate, but it's not a phone for everyone.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gsblodgett
    10/31/2006
    Posts:1
    • Re: Make it available in the US
      I agree. My wife and daughter never use the semi-fancy features on their cell phones (they are too difficult to use anyway), and I use text messaging only occasionaly. I will use Internet access only when it allows me to make cheap calls from abroad (I already use a VOIP service from the US, at Skype-like rates, for foreign calls).
      Rate this comment: 12345

      PeterBradsha...
      10/31/2006
      Posts:1
    • Re: Make it available in the US
      I agree 100%.  Many of my family members, including myself, have had our voice message shut off on our cell phones, because they are so complicated to access that, we hit wrong numbers and then the security shuts off access to the messages and tells us we need to call up Verizon, to have the security codes reset, when I can't remember the last ones, I have to get new ones, because THEY decided that there was a security issue, not me????? I HATE my cell phone.  I agree with my son, who has told the providers that he would pay MORE, to get a phone that had NO bells and whistles, and just lasted longer between charges.  I plan to send off a message to Verizon, telling them, that if this phone was available, I would purchase it. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      hughshinn
      07/20/2007
      Posts:1
  • cheaper calls is what they need - not a featureless phone
    Water resistant phones for developing countries? Er...yeah. I doubt that poor people in developing countries are any more prone to getting their phones wet than those who are well off. Unless, you conjure up a sterotypical image of them toiling away in rice paddies - and then have them fumbling for their phones.

    If someone has the resources and facility to pay their bill, they will not be scratching up cash for a phone. There are plenty of cheap basic phones around with good standby and talk time.

    In a 12 month period, people spend way more on phone bills than they do on a handset. It's insulting to say that poor people do not want all the features of a modern handset - they want it as much as the next guy.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    sunmaster14
    10/31/2006
    Posts:2
    • Re: cheaper calls is what they need - not a featureless phone
      It seems likely to me that you haven't had much opportunity to travel outside the USA.  In most countries where I have been (From East Asia to Eastern Europe, etc) a waterproof phone is a huge advantage.  Most people in these countries either walk or ride their bycicles to most destinations: this involves rain storms and mud puddles.  Even if they ride a bus, most people have to wait in the rain.  In poor areas of the world, even for the "middle class" a car is rare.  In addition, in most countries it is actually cheaper to use a cell phone than to use a traditional land line.  And by far it is cheaper to use a cell phone in developing countries than it is in the USA.

      You talk about stereotypes, but then you put up one of your own: you assume that if someone is rich enough to have a cell phone that they are rich enough not to work/commute outside in the open air.  I am affraid your assumption is wrong.  Sometimes the farmers are actually wealthier than the urbanites.  Many times whether urban or rural, outside weather is part of everyday life.

      Please be more considerate before jumping to assumptions that are not supported by facts.

      By the way, even here in the USA, I would love to have a simple, waterproof phone that has long battery life and no gizmos, why wouldn't someone overseas want the same thing?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      kwfinken
      11/17/2006
      Posts:1
      • Re: cheaper calls is what they need - not a featureless phone
        "It seems likely to me that you haven't had much opportunity to travel outside the USA".

        I'm not in the USA - so, whatever seems likely to you is wrong, first cab off the rank. I live in Australia. Contrary to popular belief, as well as drought, we also have rain here in Australia - and it forms puddles a plenty.

        We also ride bikes - I ride a bike to work - yes, even in the rain. Like any sensible person, when it's raining I put my phone in my pocket, so it doesn't get wet - I don't hold it aloft waiting for a lightning strike. Water ingress voids the warranty on any mobile phone - you know that.

        "... you assume that if someone is rich enough to have a cell phone that they are rich enough not to work/commute outside in the open air."

        Where the devil did you gleen that? I honestly think you went looking for an arguement.

        What I said was, if people can afford to pay their mobile phone bill, they will not be scratching to put money together for a reasonable handset - so why dumb-down the handset with the expectation that poor people will not want the cool features? What they want is cheaper calls. That's what I said.

        Apart from a pensioner or very low user, who stretches $20 out over vodafone's 365 day prepaid plan we all spend more on calls than we do on a handset in a 12 month period.

        "By the way, even here in the USA, I would love to have a simple, waterproof phone that has long battery life and no gizmos, why wouldn't someone overseas want the same thing?"

        That's like saying "here in the USA I'd like to live in a straw hut out in my backyard - so why wouldn't someone in an underdeveloped country want to do the same?"

        Get it? Got it? Good!
        Rate this comment: 12345

        sunmaster14
        12/23/2006
        Posts:2
  • good tecnology
    motorola has introduced a good technology ideally suited to rural & suburban india.hope they add new-edge technology to these phones.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    cool_gaurav1...
    11/01/2006
    Posts:1
  • mobile advertising platform
    Given the population density of India, a means to achieve greater mobile phone use would be to offer a mobile phone that can presents advertising to persons standing near the mobile phone user while he/she speaks in a non-handsfree mode.
    The mobile phone subscriber could earn discounted/free talk time, content, etc. for using such a phone, and the service provider could earn advertising revenue. This will also allow the sale of better equipped phones.
    I have filed a patent for such a phone
    India Patent Application No. 5203/DELNP/2006

    For a quick look at a couple of the embodiments, visit www.getmomobile.com.

    -A.J.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    A.J.
    11/10/2006
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.