Motorola's Dumb PhoneA new mobile phone that's rather simple bucks the trend toward more complicated, power-hungry devices.
Mobile phones in the United States are more power-hungry and complicated than ever. But one of the latest phones from Motorola, aimed primarily at other markets and due out by the end of the year, is just the opposite. Looking for more customers, the company did extensive market research in poor countries. The result: the company's slimmest phone yet, boasting cutting-edge technology that--rather than adding complexity--extends battery life and makes the phone simpler to use.
Called the Motofone, the new device is cheap. But it still retains some of the style of the company's Razr, which can cost many times as much. Research showed that style matters "regardless of income or social status," says Motorola's manager for the phone project, Rafael Colorado, who is himself from one of the target countries, Colombia. The company hopes the design will help win new customers in large emerging markets, such as India, where there isn't yet a "signature product" equivalent to the Razr, says Ryan Reith, a research analyst for the market research firm IDC. Currently, Nokia is doing better than Motorola in these markets, he says. The phone may also appeal to new users in countries such as the United States, he says, or to anyone who just wants a simple phone that works well. The phone's most distinctive feature is its screen, a high-contrast reflective display using a new technology invented at MIT. Commercialized by E Ink of Cambridge, MA, the display has been described as electronic paper. Like paper, it does not rely on a backlight, as in LCDs, or a constant supply of electricity, as in emissive displays based on organic light-emitting devices. Indeed, it uses no power to display an image--only to change the image on the screen. The image itself is composed of tiny spheres containing nanoscopic black and white particles. Russell Wilcox, E Ink's president and CEO, says the particles are something like tiny bits of ink and paper. Whether the spheres appear black or white depends on the charge of an underlying electrode. A negative electrode repels the negatively charged black particles, forcing them to the top of the sphere, and attracts the positively charged white particles, pulling them to the bottom and out of sight. The result is a black dot. Dots of various shades of gray can be created by changing the charge at different intervals, allowing black and white particles to mix. The display is very easy to see even in full sunlight but uses much less energy than an LCD, Wilcox says. The display technology has been in development for about 10 years and is starting to find its way into other products, such as the new Sony Reader and a thin, curved watch from Seiko. It is well suited in several ways to a phone designed for poor countries, says Motorola's chief technology officer, Padmasree Warrior. The efficient display was attractive, she says, because, "power is an issue in rural India." The saved power allowed Motorola to use a small, less expensive battery, even though the phone offers eight hours of talk time and 12 days of standby time. According to Colorado, a user could charge the phone by riding a bicycle, a dominant mode of transportation in India. In a bike equipped with an inexpensive dynamo-based system Motorola is also developing, it would take about two hours of biking at a leisurely pace.
|
Rethinking the Cell Phone
02/14/2008










Comments
2.These phones will also compete with grey market imports and second hand phones sourced abroad as well as locally which will be significantly cheaper than anything motorola can sell this phone for and have more features at the same time.
3.A phone without a backlight and no LED flashlight makes no sense in a country like India, where the mobile phone LCD backlight is frequently used as a flashlight. Nokia were the first to realise the potential of this when they incorporated one into the Nokia 1100.
4.Are slim phones that popular? More of my friends have fat chunky Nokias (6600 etc.) than slim samsungs and motorolas. Also these phones will have to undertake extremely rough handling and climates, a situation where more material is better.
5.I personally think that "budget" phones and "budget" computers are more likely to find a market amongst geeks with a thing for such stuff.
6.What motorola should really be doing is refurbishing old motorola phones and reselling them. This won't cost them much as motorola phones in India have pathetic resale value. I had a motorola C115 on which I lost 80% of the cash in 10 months. Just 2 months later my mother exchanged her 5 year old Nokia 3300 for more.
potaman
10/26/2006
Posts:1
v_pradeep4u
10/27/2006
Posts:1
the_dukeman
10/30/2006
Posts:1
kellyhair
10/31/2006
Posts:1
what happens to this wonderful e-ink display in these situations?
what 99% of the world population need (after safe water) is a cell phone that you can use to talk, to listen, and a battery that longs a month, for US$ 50. That's the future, not embedded cameras, voice recognition, games, calculators and other useless gadgets, IMHO
shikida
10/31/2006
Posts:1
gsblodgett
10/31/2006
Posts:1
PeterBradsha...
10/31/2006
Posts:1
hughshinn
07/20/2007
Posts:1
If someone has the resources and facility to pay their bill, they will not be scratching up cash for a phone. There are plenty of cheap basic phones around with good standby and talk time.
In a 12 month period, people spend way more on phone bills than they do on a handset. It's insulting to say that poor people do not want all the features of a modern handset - they want it as much as the next guy.
sunmaster14
10/31/2006
Posts:2
You talk about stereotypes, but then you put up one of your own: you assume that if someone is rich enough to have a cell phone that they are rich enough not to work/commute outside in the open air. I am affraid your assumption is wrong. Sometimes the farmers are actually wealthier than the urbanites. Many times whether urban or rural, outside weather is part of everyday life.
Please be more considerate before jumping to assumptions that are not supported by facts.
By the way, even here in the USA, I would love to have a simple, waterproof phone that has long battery life and no gizmos, why wouldn't someone overseas want the same thing?
kwfinken
11/17/2006
Posts:1
I'm not in the USA - so, whatever seems likely to you is wrong, first cab off the rank. I live in Australia. Contrary to popular belief, as well as drought, we also have rain here in Australia - and it forms puddles a plenty.
We also ride bikes - I ride a bike to work - yes, even in the rain. Like any sensible person, when it's raining I put my phone in my pocket, so it doesn't get wet - I don't hold it aloft waiting for a lightning strike. Water ingress voids the warranty on any mobile phone - you know that.
"... you assume that if someone is rich enough to have a cell phone that they are rich enough not to work/commute outside in the open air."
Where the devil did you gleen that? I honestly think you went looking for an arguement.
What I said was, if people can afford to pay their mobile phone bill, they will not be scratching to put money together for a reasonable handset - so why dumb-down the handset with the expectation that poor people will not want the cool features? What they want is cheaper calls. That's what I said.
Apart from a pensioner or very low user, who stretches $20 out over vodafone's 365 day prepaid plan we all spend more on calls than we do on a handset in a 12 month period.
"By the way, even here in the USA, I would love to have a simple, waterproof phone that has long battery life and no gizmos, why wouldn't someone overseas want the same thing?"
That's like saying "here in the USA I'd like to live in a straw hut out in my backyard - so why wouldn't someone in an underdeveloped country want to do the same?"
Get it? Got it? Good!
sunmaster14
12/23/2006
Posts:2
cool_gaurav1...
11/01/2006
Posts:1
The mobile phone subscriber could earn discounted/free talk time, content, etc. for using such a phone, and the service provider could earn advertising revenue. This will also allow the sale of better equipped phones.
I have filed a patent for such a phone
India Patent Application No. 5203/DELNP/2006
For a quick look at a couple of the embodiments, visit www.getmomobile.com.
-A.J.
A.J.
11/10/2006
Posts:1