Dutch biofuels startup Bioecon and Khosla Ventures have launched a joint venture called Kior, which will commercialize Bioecon's process for converting agricultural waste directly into "biocrude," a mixture of small hydrocarbon molecules that can be processed into fuels such as gasoline or diesel in existing oil refineries. The process, Kior claims, boasts numerous advantages over other methods of producing biofuels: it could prove relatively cheap, relies on a nontoxic catalyst, taps into the present fuel-refining and transportation infrastructure, and produces clean-burning fuels that can be used in existing engines.
 |
Fossil free: Biofuels startup Kior says that its new thermochemical process can produce “biocrude,” a hydrocarbon mixture that closely resembles crude oil, from almost any agricultural by-product, including the stems and stalks of corn plants (shown here).
Credit: Bob Allan, NREL
|
Biofuels are widely seen as a key stepping-stone on the path from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources, particularly for transportation. Their use could also reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. But ethanol, the most widely produced biofuel, contains little energy compared with gasoline or diesel. And a great deal of energy goes into its production: growing the grain from which it is fermented, distilling it, and transporting it. Many biofuels boosters have pinned their hopes on finding ways to produce ethanol from cellulose, the tough polymer that makes up much of plant stems and wood. In practice, though, cellulose must be broken down into simple sugars before it can be fermented into ethanol or converted into synthetic gas and turned into fuels. Despite three decades of research, these remain difficult, expensive, and energy-intensive processes that are not yet commercially viable. Additionally, recent research shows that ethanol, which is highly volatile, may actually exacerbate smog problems when it evaporates directly into the air instead of burning in vehicle engines.
The way to make cellulosic biofuels viable, says Bioecon's founder, Paul O'Connor, is to use catalysts to convert biomass into a hydrocarbon biocrude that can be processed into gasoline and diesel in existing petroleum refineries. After decades developing catalysts for the petroleum industry, O'Connor started Bioecon in early 2006 to develop methods for converting biomass directly into biofuels. His first success is a catalytic process that can convert cellulosic biomass into short-chain hydrocarbons about six to thirteen carbon atoms long. Khosla Ventures agreed to provide an undisclosed amount of series A funding to spinoff Kior in order to commercialize the process. Vinod Khosla, founder of the venture fund, believes that converting biomass into liquid transportation fuels is key to decreasing greenhouse-gas emissions and compensating for dwindling petroleum reserves. Khosla is funding a number of biofuels startups with competing technologies and says that Kior's approach is unique. "They have some very clever proprietary catalytic approaches that are pretty compelling," he says. "They can produce relatively cheap crude oil--that's attractive."
Story continues below
The most effective method of converting biomass into fuel is to subject it to high temperatures and high pressure to produce synthetic gas, or syngas. In the presence of a catalyst, the syngas reacts to produce fuels such as ethanol or methanol (used as an additive in biodiesel). But this is a costly process, and catalysts able to withstand the high temperature of the syngas are expensive and frequently toxic.
Attempts to produce fuel by directly exposing agricultural cellulose to a catalyst have had little success because most of the cellulose is trapped inside plant stems and stalks. O'Connor says that while the Bioecon researchers are developing new catalysts, their "biomass cracking" process is the real breakthrough. Using proprietary methods, they have been able to insert a catalyst inside the structure of the biomass, improving the contact between the materials and increasing the efficiency of the process. While O'Connor won't go into details, he says that the most basic version of the technique might involve impregnating the biomass with a solution containing the catalyst; the catalyst would then be recrystallized. "What we're doing now is improving the method to make it easier and cheaper," O'Connor says.
Comments
The answer is ofcourse harvesting of seaweed. You have huge refinary ships that process the seaweed collected with smaller boats. You pump the ready fuel to tankers and the waste products can be shipped as fertilizers (?)
Land can be used for more constructive things. E.g. forests
norppa
11/09/2007
Posts:1
urian1975
11/09/2007
Posts:16
Tysto
11/09/2007
Posts:24
Why not use sewage treatment plants as biomass converters? The infrastructure for delivering the biomass is there, we know how to handle it safely, there's plenty of supply and we get a beneficial product out of it in the end (besides Milorganite). I'm sure the energy content of waste has to be something greater than zero and pipelines could be put in place to carry the fuel to distribution networks.
kearns
11/09/2007
Posts:29
- I think there is also potential for bringing into play a cost efficient domestic waste disposal strategy. I know that all my lawn and tree clippings go into the bin, but wouldn't it be great to tap into all that unused energy from my house, and my neighbor's house, etc. etc. Ad nauseum...!
Connerjason
11/09/2007
Posts:2
and there are literal forests in a couple of continents.Not withstanding our own ability to grow it.It could be a never ending resource.
McMillan968
11/10/2007
Posts:38
Rob van der Meij, KiOR Inc.
robvandermei...
11/11/2007
Posts:1
michael.copp...
11/11/2007
Posts:1
This is great news, if it pans out well.
Does the biomass need to be dried throughly for this process? Eliminating that step (and the ability to provide relatively decentralized/on-site processing) would be huge.
Congrats in the successes so far.
mbmurphy777
11/12/2007
Posts:14
RD
11/27/2007
Posts:125
RD
01/23/2008
Posts:125
seveprim
11/16/2007
Posts:1
DJTal
11/18/2007
Posts:145
markyannone
11/19/2007
Posts:2
Rudolf
11/19/2007
Posts:1
http://www.unh.edu/p2/biodiesel/article_alge.html
and
http://www.livefuels.com/
killian
11/26/2007
Posts:70
MICROBIOBOB
11/19/2007
Posts:2
At our house, we are gradually working our way towards going 'off the grid', but this makes us realize that the first step is reduction in consumption, since generally once you go off cheap fossil fuel, you really appreciate how much energy is worth and how hard it is to get.
So every article or discussion of some form of alternative energy supply should be accompanied by discussion of new and creative ways to reduce usage.
Generally, it seems like these reductions come from: Community (sharing things), being 'light', being more easily satisfied, moderating wants, better systems, and technology. It can be just as useful to look to the past as to the future for 'innovative' systemic (or even technological) solutions to many problems.
nelagnelag
11/26/2007
Posts:1
Daniel from ...
01/09/2008
Posts:8
This method sounds like a step forward from the high-energy biocrude processes proposed so far, which cost $100/bbl or more and make a low-quality fuel. Maybe Kior represents a technology that yields high-ER quality fuel for about $85/bbl.
The problem with costly alternatives is that they would be victims of their own success. Look at ethanol: facing a glut and high feedstock prices. If we make significant amounts of synfuels, then they need to be cheap in order to compete with falling oil prices. Otherwise, they remain marginal.
Without knowing specifics about these catalysts, it's quite possible that they will be in limited supply.
MakeSense
01/23/2008
Posts:99
Cost of implementing it would be low, but they wont go for it it would have to be wasteful and destructive and damage our planet beyond repair before you people get it. stop speaking it and start using it. hehehe lol You people looking for oil outa wood man oh man simple. Only for paint maybe, anyways enuff said some people really need to use their heads and not something else, or if we implement this, the other way around, ohhh ehehehe damn im funny.
hano
05/31/2008
Posts:3
MickeyFouse
12/09/2008
Posts:47