Skip to Content

The European Parliament has approved the new EU Copyright Directive, but it will be subject to a final vote next year before becoming law. A lot of artists are happy, but free-internet advocates are not.

The news: The European Parliament voted by 438 to 226 to pass the law, which aims to compensate artists and creators. Critics, however, claim it will have a chilling effect on a free and open internet. The crucial points are two sections of the directive: Article 11 and 13, dubbed the hyperlink tax and the upload filter, respectively.

Article 11 would oblige internet firms to pay news outlets for reusing their content, while Article 13 would require web giants to automatically filter copyrighted material, such as songs or videos, unless they have been specifically licensed. Some critics have complained that this will effectively stop people from sharing user-generated content such as brilliant cat memes.

The row over the law has also created some interesting adversaries, pitching artists like Paul McCartney against Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales.

How did we get here? The directive was first suggested in 2016 to help creative industries claw back money from the internet giants. Members of the European Parliament rejected it in July this year, but rather than being abandoned the legislation was reassessed, with over 100 amendments added.

What’s next? The amendments approved this week will be subject to more tweaking before the legislation gets voted on again in January 2019. 

Deep Dive

Policy

Is there anything more fascinating than a hidden world?

Some hidden worlds--whether in space, deep in the ocean, or in the form of waves or microbes--remain stubbornly unseen. Here's how technology is being used to reveal them.

Africa’s push to regulate AI starts now        

AI is expanding across the continent and new policies are taking shape. But poor digital infrastructure and regulatory bottlenecks could slow adoption.

Yes, remote learning can work for preschoolers

The largest-ever humanitarian intervention in early childhood education shows that remote learning can produce results comparable to a year of in-person teaching.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.