Skip to Content
Uncategorized

South Korea Is Decreasing Tax Breaks on Automation, and That’s Probably a Bad Idea

August 9, 2017

There’s a school of thought that goes a bit like this: robots are getting better at doing human tasks, and that's eroding jobs and making companies more money. So why not place taxes on them as a way of ensuring that society benefits from their productivity? Even Bill Gates has been known to back the idea.

According to the South China Morning Post, South Korea appears to buy into that notion, at least a little. The nation has previously given companies tax breaks of between 3 and 7 percent for buying industrial automation equipment, like robots. Now, it plans to decrease those benefits by 2 percent. That might not seem like a big change, and it's certainly not a full-on "robot tax"—but it will, obviously, slow the rate at which automation is introduced in the country.

If anything, that’s a shift in the wrong direction. Economic growth of manufacturing has slowed in South Korea recently. Increased productivity could turn that around, and more widespread adoption of automation is one of the ways that such a productivity boost could be brought about. That suggests that keeping the tax breaks in place, or even making them more generous, might be a good idea. And anyway, as the Economist pointed out earlier this year, there are plenty of other good reasons not to further tax robots, too.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

How scientists traced a mysterious covid case back to six toilets

When wastewater surveillance turns into a hunt for a single infected individual, the ethics get tricky.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

It’s time to retire the term “user”

The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.