We noticed you're browsing in private or incognito mode.

To continue reading this article, please exit incognito mode or log in.

Not an Insider? Subscribe now for unlimited access to online articles.

An illustration of a hand wiping away air pollution from the sky above a smokestack.
  • Lan Truong
  • Smog patrol

    Satellites help track China’s emissions.

    The Chinese government has implemented measures to clean up the air pollution that has smothered its cities for decades. Are they effective? A study coauthored by an MIT scholar shows that one key antipollution law is indeed working—but unevenly.

    The study examines a Chinese law, in effect since 2014, requiring coal-fired power plants to significantly reduce emissions of sulfur dioxide, a pollutant associated with respiratory illnesses. Overall, the concentration of these emissions at coal power plants fell by 13.9 percent. However, the law also called for greater emissions reductions in more heavily polluted and more populous regions, and those “key” regions are precisely where plants may have been least compliant. Only 50 percent reported meeting the new standard, and remote data—as opposed to readings supplied by the plants themselves—suggests that the results were even worse.

    This story is part of the September/October 2018 Issue of the MIT News magazine
    See the rest of the issue

    “We see the lowest correspondence between sulfur dioxide reported by plants and independent satellite measures in key regions,” says Valerie Karplus, an assistant professor at Sloan and coauthor of a paper detailing the results. That includes coal-fired plants near such populous, economically well-off places as Beijing and Shanghai.  

    To conduct the study, Karplus and colleagues from the University of Colorado and Columbia University examined sulfur dioxide data collected by 256 plants in four provinces using continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS), sensor systems that capture concentrations of pollution in the waste gases emitted from power plants. They compared that data with NASA satellite data that remotely measures sulfur dioxide concentrations globally and in geographic detail.

    Data from the two monitoring systems corresponded closely in “non-key” regions, where the maximum allowable concentration of sulfur dioxide was lowered from 400 to 200 milligrams per cubic meter. But in the key regions, where the limit was placed at 50 milligrams per cubic meter, the research found no evidence of correspondence.

    That tougher standard may have been harder for power plants to meet. As the researchers noted in their paper, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, “stricter new standards and pressure to comply may have generated incentives for plant managers to falsify or selectively omit concentration data.”

    The fact that China not only uses but shares CEMS data is “a sign of real progress in environmental management,” Karplus says. But the satellite data is also vital to accurate monitoring—and isn’t subject to actions power plants might take to influence the results, such as incomplete reporting or manipulation of sensors. “Governments can and should use remote sensing data as a way of providing an independent check on the numbers they’re getting from emitters who are subject to a particular policy,” she says. “Satellite data could help to support central government ambitions to curb air pollution.”

    Tightening pollution standards is necessary but not sufficient to achieving lasting reductions in pollution, Karplus says: “Environmental policy doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It requires reshaping prevailing understanding of firms’ environmental responsibility and establishing credible reporting systems. In China, there is still a long way to go, but recent progress is very encouraging.”

    Keep up with the latest in China at EmTech Digital.

    The Countdown has begun.
    March 25-26, 2019
    San Francisco, CA

    Register now
    An illustration of a hand wiping away air pollution from the sky above a smokestack.
    Next in MIT News
    Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Insider Plus.
    • Insider Plus {! insider.prices.plus !}*

      {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

      Everything included in Insider Basic, plus the digital magazine, extensive archive, ad-free web experience, and discounts to partner offerings and MIT Technology Review events.

      See details+

      Print + Digital Magazine (6 bi-monthly issues)

      Unlimited online access including all articles, multimedia, and more

      The Download newsletter with top tech stories delivered daily to your inbox

      Technology Review PDF magazine archive, including articles, images, and covers dating back to 1899

      10% Discount to MIT Technology Review events and MIT Press

      Ad-free website experience

    You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. This is your last free article this month. for unlimited online access. You've read all your free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for more, or for unlimited online access. for two more free articles, or for unlimited online access.