Skip to Content
Blockchain

America’s cryptocurrency tax policy is confusing everyone

Lack of clarity from the Internal Revenue Service is creating headaches for users of Bitcoin and other digital currencies.
April 12, 2018
John Malta

If tax day makes you nervous, you might want to refrain from trading cryptocurrencies—at least until the Internal Revenue Service clarifies how the hell it intends to tax them. Navigating the legal gray areas left by today’s rules can be a bit like wandering through a minefield.

The lack of guidance isn’t new. But now that cryptocurrency has gone mainstream, thanks to the initial coin offering boom and the Great Bitcoin Bull Run of 2017, there’s a lot more money on the line—and far more confused cryptocurrency users.

This piece appears in our twice-weekly newsletter Chain Letter, which covers the world of blockchains and cryptocurrencies. Sign up here—it’s free!

Taxing properties: According to a 2014 guidance (PDF) from the IRS, cryptocurrencies are considered property, which makes them subject to capital-gains and income taxes. Buying and holding cryptocurrency is not a taxable event. But if you use digital coins to buy anything—even just a cup of coffee—after your holdings have increased in value, you’ve experienced a gain, and that’s taxable. So for every purchase, you must report the amount you spent and the difference between the currency’s value when you spent it and the value when you first got it. If you came out ahead, you have to pay tax. Fun.

Headaches for the hard-core: Generally speaking, the more devoted a cryptocurrency user you are, the more complicated it is to track everything the IRS needs, says Chandan Lodha, cofounder of CoinTracker, which has developed software meant to help with tax preparation for the crypto set. If you do things like trade on multiple exchanges, trade multiple coins, or execute swaps of one cryptocurrency for another, “you have to do a bunch of work in accounting and record keeping in order to have any hope” of getting your taxes right, he says.

Pay the Man later: Some traders have managed to avoid paying taxes on cryptocurrency-for-cryptocurrency trades by appealing to something called the “like-kind exception,” which lets people defer tax payments when trading one property for another, similar property. For instance, if you trade your house for another one, which then gains in value, you don’t have to pay taxes on that gain until you have the cash for it (since the increase in value is tied up in the house itself). But a provision in the new tax law signed late last year limits this exception to real estate, meaning cryptocurrency traders must pay taxes on crypto-for-crypto trades made after December 31, 2017, when the law took effect. What about trades before that? That’s less clear.

What ... the ... fork? Nothing exposes the of lack clarity on cryptocurrency taxes quite like a “hard fork,” an event in which a blockchain network splits and creates a second currency. A hard fork of Bitcoin last August that created Bitcoin Cash resulted in a windfall for Bitcoin users, if they wanted it—the same amount of Bitcoin Cash as they held in Bitcoin. Was that income? If so, how should they determine its value for tax purposes? The IRS hasn’t offered any guidance.

The taxpayer’s call: The gray areas don’t end there, says Lodha: as with everything crypto, the rabbit hole goes deep, and some people are trying all kinds of tricks to cut their tax bills. But whatever they do, Lodha says, cryptocurrency traders have a choice. “Would you rather be safe than sorry, but maybe overpay your bill? Or do you want to gamble and then maybe you’ll get audited and maybe you’ll have to pay interest and penalties?”

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

How scientists traced a mysterious covid case back to six toilets

When wastewater surveillance turns into a hunt for a single infected individual, the ethics get tricky.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

Google DeepMind’s new generative model makes Super Mario–like games from scratch

Genie learns how to control games by watching hours and hours of video. It could help train next-gen robots too.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.