Supercomputer Powered by Mobile Chips Suggests New Threat to Intel
Supercomputers can’t keep getting faster unless they start eating less power. Chips like those in your phone could make that possible.
The world’s biggest chip maker, Intel, is struggling because it missed out on the market in chips for mobile devices. Now mobile chips are coming for a market Intel has long had mostly to itself, supercomputers.
Supercomputers are used in government, academia, and industry for research on topics as varied as nuclear weapons and potential new drugs. Intel chips power more than 90 percent of the 500 most powerful of these, as well as dominating the server and PC markets. But smartphones and tablets are almost all powered by chips built using designs licensed from U.K. company ARM, which has long prioritized energy efficiency (see “Intel Outside”).
Fujitsu said this week that it will use ARM-based processors to build a successor to an existing Japanese supercomputer called Project K. Fujitsu is building the "Post-K" machine for the Riken Advanced Institute for Computational Science, which plans to use it for biomedical, climate, and energy research. The computer is slated to be installed and turned on in 2020.
Fujitsu announced that plan at the International Supercomputing Conference in Germany, where there was more bad news for Intel. A new list of the world’s most powerful supercomputers was revealed, and the new top machine is not based on Intel’s x86 technology.
The makers of the Chinese TaihuLight system, at the National Supercomputing Center in the Chinese city of Wuxi, used a custom-built processor that uses an unspecified architecture built by the Chinese (see “New Fastest Supercomputer Is Chinese Through and Through”).
The power of supercomputers can be measured by the number of operations they can perform per second, using a metric known as FLOPS. TaihuLight performs at 93 petaflops—a quadrillion per second.
TaihuLight has a crazy amount of computing power, but it isn’t enough. And the prospects for making supercomputers get faster have started to look murky in recent years. Using more powerful chips—usually from Intel—used to deliver predictable gains in high-performance computing. But other factors, like the speed at which data can be moved around inside the system, have become limiting. And the power bills racked up by top supercomputers have become a major headache. The race to build bigger machines has seemingly hit a wall.
Computers from supercomputers down to mobile devices used to get more and more powerful as chip makers crammed more and smaller transistors onto chips, a trend known as Moore’s Law. But transistors are no longer shrinking so fast, and the power consumption of chips is getting out of control. Supercomputer builders have started looking to alternative designs that could allow their machines to keep getting faster. One of those is ARM.
“It’s a disruptive time to be in high performance computing,” says James Cuff, assistant dean for research computing at Harvard University. “Those that design machines inside the power envelope with the right support of key algorithms and codes are going to be the players that ultimately win in this new game.”
ARM has been putting dollars into getting its chips into high-performance computers since 2011. It has struck partnerships with IBM and graphics chip maker Nvidia, and it recently created software partnerships to make sure popular research software will run on ARM-based processors.
ARM’s strategy is yet to be fully tested, since no supercomputer based on its chip designs has been built, points out Jack Dongarra, a professor of computer science at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville, one of the authors of the list of the 500 most powerful supercomputers. But in supercomputing’s new energy-conscious era, it could make sense. “I think ARM has great potential,” he says. “It hasn’t been demonstrated in a large-scale machine so far. But there is nothing in the design that would limit its use.”
Update: An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that a petaflop is equal to a thousand billion per second. It is a quadrillion per second.
Couldn't make it to EmTech Next to meet experts in AI, Robotics and the Economy?Go behind the scenes and check out our video