Hello,

We noticed you're browsing in private or incognito mode.

To continue reading this article, please exit incognito mode or log in.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe now for unlimited access to online articles.

Connectivity

“But I Was Only Joking!” Why Facebook Needs an Irony Emoji

The social network’s new Reactions omit the most necessary of signs.

Facebook announced Wednesday that it was launching “Facebook Reactions,” which the social networking giant described as “an extension of the Like button, to give you more ways to share your reaction to a post in a quick and easy way.”

According to Sammi Krug, a product manager at Facebook, the company now understands “that there should be more ways to easily and quickly express how something you see in News Feed makes you feel.” That makes sense: who has not seen that a friend’s parent has died but hesitated to hit the “like” button as a show of solidarity, or read something galling and not wished to make any gesture of approval?

Facebook will now offer six options for responding to a post: Like, Love, Haha, Wow, Sad, or Angry. Users can add a reaction, by holding down the Like button on their mobile phones or hovering over the Like button. The little emojis are animated to dance becomingly before they swoop down to punctuate a post.

Notably absent is a Reaction denoting irony. (Facebook already offered a bewildering number of emojis, describing “feelings” ranging from “determined” to “chill,” that users could employ when composing their status. One of the offered feelings is “sarcastic.” But sarcasm—the grumpy person’s wit—is different from irony.) 

Vladimir Nabokov had an idea for an irony symbol long before emoji became ubiquitous.

That’s a pity, because irony on the Internet is the most fleeting and easily misconstrued of responses. Irony requires context to be grasped, and demands a high degree of culture to understand. After all, an ironic utterance means something other than what it literally says, and requires for its function what the 20th century English critic I. A. Richards called “the bringing in of the opposite, the complementary impulse” (Principles of Literary Criticism, 1925).

Imagine the utility of a little Irony sticker! One could drily punctuate one’s own updates with irony symbols, or note for the idiots at the back of the class that another’s post was in fact ironic, or even simply telegraph ironic detachment.

What would such an irony symbol look like? Fortunately, the need for an irony sign is not new, and the question has been pondered and answered. In 1899, the French poet Alcanter de Brahms said that ironists should always use a kind of upside down question mark: “le petit signe flagellateur.” But the novelist Vladimir Nabokov answered the question best, decades before social networks. He suggested the “sly smile” of a horizontal parenthesis.

Learn from the humans leading the way in connectivity at EmTech Next. Register Today!
June 11-12, 2019
Cambridge, MA

Register now
Vladimir Nabokov had an idea for an irony symbol long before emoji became ubiquitous.
More from Connectivity

What it means to be constantly connected with each other and vast sources of information.

Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Print + All Access Digital.
  • Print + All Access Digital {! insider.prices.print_digital !}*

    {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

    The best of MIT Technology Review in print and online, plus unlimited access to our online archive, an ad-free web experience, discounts to MIT Technology Review events, and The Download delivered to your email in-box each weekday.

    See details+

    12-month subscription

    Unlimited access to all our daily online news and feature stories

    6 bi-monthly issues of print + digital magazine

    10% discount to MIT Technology Review events

    Access to entire PDF magazine archive dating back to 1899

    Ad-free website experience

    The Download: newsletter delivery each weekday to your inbox

    The MIT Technology Review App

/3
You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. This is your last free article this month. for unlimited online access. You've read all your free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for more, or for unlimited online access. for two more free articles, or for unlimited online access.