A Collection of Articles
Edit
Kevin Bullis

A View from Kevin Bullis

World’s Largest Solar Thermal Power Plant Delivers Power for the First Time

The $2.2 billion Ivanpah solar power plant can now generate electricity. But was it worth the money?

  • September 24, 2013

Years from now, when the Solyndra debacle has long faded from memory, the most visible legacy of the controversial U.S. DOE loan program could very well be a field of nearly 200,000 mirrors in the desert.

Powered up: One of three towers at Brightsource Energy’s Ivanpah power plant glows as thousands of mirrors focus sunlight on it to generate electricity for the first time. 

Over Par: The Ivanpah power plant is composed of three segments. Each is the size of the golf course seen in the foreground.

It Sparkles: Each of the nearly 200,000 mirrors in the Ivanpah field is the size of a door. But they look tiny here.

Blowing steam: The central tower is heated up in one of the tests to confirm the system could generate steam. This photo shows the large cooling system. 

Power controller: Sets of mirrors, called heliostats, are aligned with the tracking systems shown here. Software helps ensure that all of the mirrors move in a coordinated way through the day.

Today, Brightsource Energy announced that its huge, DOE-funded solar thermal power plant at Ivanpah, California, delivered power to the grid for the first time. It was part of a test to demonstrate the system, which uses mirrors to focus sunlight on towers to generate steam. The steam is then used to spin turbines and generate electricity. The plant isn’t quite finished yet, but is expected to be done by the end of the year.

Looking at pictures of the project, it’s hard not to be a little encouraged that the U.S. still has the ability to take on big projects (see “Why We Can’t Solve Big Problems” and “In Pictures: The World’s Largest Solar Thermal Power Plant”). Its sheer size and obvious complexity are impressive—as is its price tag. The $2.2 billion power plant was made possible by $1.6 billion in U.S. government-backed loans.

But although the project is impressive, it’s still too early to know whether decades from now it will be looked at as a relic of an ill-conceived government spending spree, or as a project that was essential to opening the way for an electric grid that doesn’t rely on fossil fuels.

From one perspective, things don’t look good. When you calculate the amount of power the plant is likely to produce over its lifetime, the cost per kilowatt-hour is likely to be much higher than for fossil-fuel power. It’s even likely to be higher than the cost of power from solar panels, thanks to the fast drop in solar-panel prices in recent years. If costs don’t come down—and decreasing the costs of mirrors and steam turbines is hard to do—solar thermal power might prove to be a dead end.

But solar thermal power has one chance at success. It’s the only form of solar that can run around the clock, even after the sun goes down (see “A Solution to Solar Power Intermittency”). This is possible because it’s relatively cheap to store heat produced during the day in the form of molten salt which can be used to make steam at night. If the U.S. decides to abandon fossil fuels in a bid to slow climate change, solar thermal might prove to be one of the most practical ways to make up for the intermittency of solar panels and wind turbines.

You've read of free articles this month.