A View from Tom Simonite
Bing Revives Decade-Old Fight Over Paid Search Results
Google’s new policy of charging online stores to appear in shopping results is “evil”, alleges Microsoft.
A little bit of Web history just repeated today, with the launch of a campaign by Microsoft to discredit Google for charging online stores to appear in shopping search results. The “Don’t Get Scroogled” campaign has strong echoes of battles fought amongst search engines such as AltaVista and AOL. The twist is that this time around is that Google – according to Microsoft – is on the other side of the fight.
Microsoft’s campaign site puts it like this:
“Google Shopping is nothing more than a list of targeted ads that unsuspecting customers assume are search results”
Back in 2002, the New York Times reported that the FTC wrote to many Web search companies to warn they must:
“[outline] the need for clear and conspicuous disclosures of paid placement, and in some instances paid inclusion, so that businesses may avoid possible future commission action.”
That letter went to AltaVista, AOL Time Warner, iWon.com, Looksmart, Terra Lycos, and Direct Hit. It also went to Microsoft, but it didn’t go to Google, which at the time took a strong position against any form of paid inclusion. It seems the pair have switched sides in the past decade.
Another big difference between this new round of the paid inclusion fight and the one before is that should the FTC decide it needs to warn search companies again, it won’t need so many stamps. There are fewer search engines now, and ComScore reported this month that Google and Bing between them have a 95 percent market share for U.S. searches. Google’s cut of that is 67 percent share of all U.S. searches.
Become an MIT Technology Review Insider for in-depth analysis and unparalleled perspective.Subscribe today