A View from The Editors

Improving Community Feedback on Our Stories

Some comment threads on our site have gotten nasty. Here’s what we’re doing about it.

  • October 24, 2012

We greatly value the insights our readers can offer. The exceptional intelligence, perspective, and wit of our audience are part of what makes MIT Technology Review different from publications that cover technology breathlessly and without context. Judging by what we hear from many of our readers, high-quality discussions about stories are among the things you value, too.

And so it has been especially distressing to see some comment threads, especially on energy stories, get ugly lately. A few readers—a very small but vocal part of our audience—have been engaging in partisan bickering and name-calling that is uncivil and unconstructive. Other readers have complained about it, and so the editors of MIT Technology Review would like to make sure our policy on comments is clear.

We will delete comments if they are not on the subject of the story at hand; if they are insulting to other commenters; or if they contain racial, ethnic, or sexist slurs. Repeat offenders will be banned. As our terms of service specify, we reserve the right to make these deletions and bans for any reason, without prior notice or warning, and without liability.

Buzz Aldrin
This story is part of our November/December 2012 Issue
See the rest of the issue
Subscribe

Sometimes when we have deleted comments and exiled rude commenters in the past, we have been accused of trying to enforce a sort of politically correct censorship. Nothing could be further from the truth. We want perspectives from anywhere on the political spectrum. But what we don’t want are comments that unimaginatively apply simple labels to people or ideas—comments in which someone spouts off, for example, that someone else is a “socialist” or “a right-wing wacko.” That kind of discourse is too easily found elsewhere online. If you disagree with a premise or a point in a story, or if you think something is inaccurate, then by all means, tell us and your fellow readers. If you think someone made an erroneous comment, disagree with it. But do so constructively. Confine your comments to the subject of the posts, and don’t attack the posters themselves.

If you can’t do those things, your post won’t be up for long. It’s not worth it to us.

Cut off? Read unlimited articles today.

Become an Insider
Already an Insider? Log in.

Uh oh–you've read all of your free articles for this month.

Insider Premium
$179.95/yr US PRICE

Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Insider Premium.
  • Insider Premium {! insider.prices.premium !}*

    {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

    Our award winning magazine, unlimited access to our story archive, special discounts to MIT Technology Review Events, and exclusive content.

    See details+

    What's Included

    Bimonthly home delivery and unlimited 24/7 access to MIT Technology Review’s website.

    The Download. Our daily newsletter of what's important in technology and innovation.

    Access to the Magazine archive. Over 24,000 articles going back to 1899 at your fingertips.

    Special Discounts to select partner offerings

    Discount to MIT Technology Review events

    Ad-free web experience

    First Look. Exclusive early access to stories.

    Insider Conversations. Listen in as our editors talk to innovators from around the world.

/
You've read all of your free articles this month. This is your last free article this month. You've read of free articles this month. or  for unlimited online access.