We noticed you're browsing in private or incognito mode.

To continue reading this article, please exit incognito mode or log in.

Not an Insider? Subscribe now for unlimited access to online articles.

Emerging Technology from the arXiv

A View from Emerging Technology from the arXiv

How to Entangle Humans (contd)

If physicists are ever to entangle humans they’ll need to understand the role that noise plays in the experiments. Now they’ve carried out the first tests to find out

  • August 23, 2012

The eye is a remarkable detector. Neuroscientists have long known that a single rod taken from a retina can respond to single photons. That’s comparable to the best artificial detectors.

But the performance of living and breathing humans is significantly worse. When researchers fire photons into the eyes of volunteers, it takes a hundred or so photons to reliably induce a response. Much of this difference is down to the fact that only about 10 per cent of the photons that enter the cornea actually reach the retina. 

But that still leaves an order of magnitude between the detection efficiency of individual rods and the behaviour of humans. Why the difference?

Today, Gibran Manasseh and pals at the University of Geneva provide an answer. 

These guys fired varying numbers of photons into the eyes of 12 healthy volunteers and who they asked to press a button when they perceived a flash. At the same time, the researchers measured each volunteer’s brain activity using EEG recordings.

The results make for interesting reading. These guys say that half the subjects regularly reported false positives, saying they saw a flash when no photons had been sent. 

They say the retina itself introduces some noise but their new result is that the brain itself introduces even more noise. “The brain adds a large contribution to the decrease in sensitivity,” they conclude.

Why is this important? This group at the University of Geneva led by Nic Gisin has an other interesting project on the go that we’ve looked at before.

Back in 2008, these guys calculated that it ought to be possible for humans to experience entanglement, the strange quantum phenomenon in which two objects share the same existence even though they are spatially separated. 

Physicists routinely measure entanglement in the lab. They create a pair of entangled photons and send them to detectors in different places. A measurement on one photon immediately influences the other, regardless of the distance between them. That’s what Einstein called “spooky action at a distance”.

Gisin and co’s idea is that you could replace one or both of the detectors with human eyes.  The process of seeing a single photon would be equivalent to measuring it which would immediately influence the other photon.

That should work when detectors can spot single photons, as single rods can do. 

Since then they’ve discovered that the experiment is significantly more difficult because humans need to receive more photons to see them.  In 2010, they produced a paper examining the challenge of entangling the required number of photons.

This latest work is important because it attempts to quantify the kind of noise that such an experiment would introduce. This will be an important factor if and when they ever attempt to use a human in such an entanglement experiment. 

What’s clear is that human entanglement experiments are looking increasingly difficult. We’ll keep our eyes open for the next instalment.  

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1208.1652: Retinal And Post-Retinal Contributions To The Quantum Efficiency Of The Human Eye

Tech Obsessive?
Become an Insider to get the story behind the story — and before anyone else.

Subscribe today
Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Insider Plus.
  • Insider Plus {! insider.prices.plus !}*

    {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

    Everything included in Insider Basic, plus the digital magazine, extensive archive, ad-free web experience, and discounts to partner offerings and MIT Technology Review events.

    See details+

    Print + Digital Magazine (6 bi-monthly issues)

    Unlimited online access including all articles, multimedia, and more

    The Download newsletter with top tech stories delivered daily to your inbox

    Technology Review PDF magazine archive, including articles, images, and covers dating back to 1899

    10% Discount to MIT Technology Review events and MIT Press

    Ad-free website experience

You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. This is your last free article this month. for unlimited online access. You've read all your free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for more, or for unlimited online access. for two more free articles, or for unlimited online access.