Hello,

We noticed you're browsing in private or incognito mode.

To continue reading this article, please exit incognito mode or log in.

Not an Insider? Subscribe now for unlimited access to online articles.

Intelligent Machines

Study Reveals a Confused View of Mobile Phone Privacy and Security

Many users’ perceptions are at odds with the realities, researchers show.

Smartphones store a wealth of valuable personal data—photos, videos, e-mail, texts, app data, GPS locations, and Web browsing habits—that is increasingly falling into the hands of advertisers, app makers, law enforcement, and crooks.

A survey published recently by the University of California, Berkeley, law researchers suggests there is a significant disconnect between many people’s perception of the security and privacy of data on their smartphones, and the reality.

The majority of mobile phone users surveyed for the report said, for example, that they didn’t like the idea of other people accessing the information stored on their mobile phones. More than 80 percent said they would not want a work colleague to use their phone, and half said they would not want even close friends to access their device. The majority of respondents also said they believed their mobile phone to be as private as their personal computer. The study involved telephoning 1,200 households on a mixture of landlines and mobile devices, and was funded by Nokia.

The reality is that millions of people already provide mobile data to marketers, business analysts, and law enforcement, often without their knowledge or consent (see “What Your Phone Knows About You” and “Getting More Value From Cell-Phone Data”). 

Most of the people surveyed for the study said they believed law enforcement need special permission to access information on a phone. In fact, law enforcement can guess a password to unlock a confiscated device, and can impersonate the phone’s owner by sending texts if the phone is unlocked. Neither activity has been struck down by the courts.

Four-fifths of respondents said they “definitely” or “probably” wouldn’t let apps collect a contacts lists. Yet that is what many companies do (see “Mobile-Ad Firms Seek New Ways to Track You” and “Apple Ignored Warnings on Address Book Access”). 

Seventy percent of respondents said they would definitely not permit their phones serve them location-based ads. Many phone apps already collect location-based data, some of which is later used commercially. This sentiment suggests that it could prove even harder than expected to make money from advertising as more Internet usage migrates to mobile devices (see “Facebook’s Earnings Underscore its Challenges” and “Facebook Considers Mobile Ads That Know What You’re Doing”).

Weren’t able to make it to the Business of Blockchain event this year? Catch up with our coverage of the event.

Watch video now
More from Intelligent Machines

Artificial intelligence and robots are transforming how we work and live.

Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Insider Plus.
  • Insider Plus {! insider.prices.plus !}*

    {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

    Everything included in Insider Basic, plus the digital magazine, extensive archive, ad-free web experience, and discounts to partner offerings and MIT Technology Review events.

    See details+

    Print + Digital Magazine (6 bi-monthly issues)

    Unlimited online access including all articles, multimedia, and more

    The Download newsletter with top tech stories delivered daily to your inbox

    Technology Review PDF magazine archive, including articles, images, and covers dating back to 1899

    10% Discount to MIT Technology Review events and MIT Press

    Ad-free website experience

/3
You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. This is your last free article this month. for unlimited online access. You've read all your free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for more, or for unlimited online access. for two more free articles, or for unlimited online access.