Christopher Mims

A View from Christopher Mims

Why The New Gawker.com is Not The Future of the Web

The only good thing about the redesign is the apoplectic reactions it inspired on Facebook and Twitter.

  • February 9, 2011

Let’s talk about information density. No medium has ever demanded as much of it as the Web – and why? Hold up a piece of A4 paper to your “generous” widescreen laptop monitor. Oops - same size. Websites are built to fill that much screen territory, if we’re lucky. Developers are constrained by a sort of lowest common denominator when it comes to available space.

In light of these constraints, you’d think the redesigned Gawker don’t-call-it-a-blog empire would make sense. Here it is, perhaps most gorgeously realized on Nick Denton’s paean to his own geek past, io9.com:

The main article slot allows for a borderline-cinematic realization of the blog form. It makes other blogs, even the Gawker network’s old design, look ho-hum by comparison.

But once you get past the giant images and new galleries (video galleries, even!) it’s not very useful or user friendly. Gawker.com’s giant, every-page-is-a-homepage blog posts eat up all the territory that used to be devoted to something humble and necessary: the dek.

Deks are that bit of text that appears below a headline. Newspapers of the old style used to use them all the time, back when they were necessiated by the hopeless jumble of columns dictated by the nature of moveable type:

Gawker.com used to use them all the time, on the homepage, right below or right next to the headlines. It made it easy to scan the day’s stories and see what was worth reading. It was the same solution people who layout news have been using to conquer the problem of scan-ability and information density for a century. Because it works.

The new Gawker.com is inviting, and it elevates the article page to the status of homepage, which is smart in the age of viewers reaching content via anything but a site’s homepage. But those little headlines in the right margin? They desperately need some context.

Get stories like this before anyone else with First Look.

Subscribe today
Already a Premium subscriber? Log in.

Uh oh–you've read all of your free articles for this month.

Insider Premium
$179.95/yr US PRICE

Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Insider Premium.
  • Insider Premium {! insider.prices.premium !}*

    {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

    Our award winning magazine, unlimited access to our story archive, special discounts to MIT Technology Review Events, and exclusive content.

    See details+

    What's Included

    Bimonthly magazine delivery and unlimited 24/7 access to MIT Technology Review’s website

    The Download: our daily newsletter of what's important in technology and innovation

    Access to the magazine PDF archive—thousands of articles going back to 1899 at your fingertips

    Special discounts to select partner offerings

    Discount to MIT Technology Review events

    Ad-free web experience

    First Look: exclusive early access to important stories, before they’re available to anyone else

    Insider Conversations: listen in on in-depth calls between our editors and today’s thought leaders

/
You've read all of your free articles this month. This is your last free article this month. You've read of free articles this month. or  for unlimited online access.