Skip to Content

Can a Gadget Blog Be about Ideas?

Watch this space to find out.
November 15, 2010

Hi there! I’m John Pavlus, and over the next two weeks, I’m going to try to write a gadget blog that I – and, god willing, you – would actually want to read.

Batman’s tech interests do not include Foursquare. Mine either. [via chickslovethecar.com]

What do I mean by that? After all, I love Gizmodo and Techmeme just as much as the next geek. But Technology Review marches to a different beat than the daily tech press. As my friend and co-blogger Christopher Mims memorably put it, TR’s beat is “further up the pipeline”: innovation in the Big Idea phase, which necessarily precedes the “ZOMG new iOS update” phase. So yes, I do like browsing, surfing, and scanning the constantly-refreshed goodies on daily tech blogs. But I like to read Tech Review.

So what kind of stuff will you find here? Innovative consumer technology, definitely. But the fact that some new gadget exists won’t be enough to get me blogging about it. There’s going to have to be some idea behind the thing that isn’t terribly obvious or incremental, and gets me curious. Why is it necessary? What problem is it solving, and how?

To that end, I’ll also be blogging about innovative “gadgets” that you’ll never be able to buy. Medical devices. Military materiel. Infrastructure improvements. Crisis-response gear. Educational aids. Laboratory equipment. Because let’s face it: not all interesting problems in the world are solved by stuff sold on Amazon. But if it’s a new tool that someone needs/builds/uses to solve a real-world problem in some new way, I’m gonna get curious. In fact, if you see some tech out there that gets you curious, you should tip me off to it.

So why are we calling this blog TechSpecs? Products, gadgets, prototypes, jury-rigged hacks, techno-stuff: it all comes from someone, somewhere, saying “I need a thing that does this but not that.” Those this’s and that’s are called specifications. You know, the gobbledygook that you usually skip in favor of the fun stuff. (I do too.) But here’s the thing: that’s where the ideas are. The hows and whys behind the whats. That’s innovation: Sometimes it just needs a translator.

So, stick around and with luck, I’ll actually live up to that tall $#&*ing order I just laid out for myself.

Oh, one more thing: Do you like that name, TechSpecs? I do, but I like “Up The Pipeline” almost as much. Tell me (on Twitter, via email, or in the comments) which blog title you’d rather see in your newsreader every day, and I’ll let the mob rule.

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

Google DeepMind’s new generative model makes Super Mario–like games from scratch

Genie learns how to control games by watching hours and hours of video. It could help train next-gen robots too.

How scientists traced a mysterious covid case back to six toilets

When wastewater surveillance turns into a hunt for a single infected individual, the ethics get tricky.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.