Skip to Content
Uncategorized

Econophysicist Predicts Date of Chinese Stock Market Collapse–Part III

First came the prediction, then the prediction came true. Now the econophysicist explains how he did it.

Back in July, econophysicist Didier Sornette at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich and a few pals predicted the impending collapse of the Shanghai Composite stock market index.

Their evidence was that the index had been growing at a faster than exponential rate, which was clearly measurable and obviously unsustainable. But Sornette and co were less forthcoming about how they were able to say a collapse was imminent. I was sceptical of this prediction and said so.

And yet at the beginning of August, the Shanghai Composite dropped by about 20 per cent and I was forced to eat my words, puzzled though I still was to their method.

Today, Sornette and co publish the method they use to make their prediction. Their method is a synthesis of ideas from the economic theory of rational expectation bubbles, from the imitation and herding behaviour of investors and traders and from the mathematical and statistical physics of bifurcations and phase transitions.

From this, they say they have discovered an unambiguous signature of a bubble market about to collapse in the form of super-exponential growth decorated with logarithmic oscillations as in the diagram above.

Sornette says he has used this method to predict the collapse of several bubbles in the last few years, including the collapse of the oil bubble last year and the US housing market in 2006.

That’s important work which could have a profound impact on economic models. If Sornette and his colleagues have put their money where there mouths are, they ought to be super rich by now.

One interesting aspect of Sornette’s predictions is that the team claim that they will not affect the market in a way that changes the forecast.

“Even in the presence of investors fully informed of the presence of the bubble and with the knowledge of its end date, it remains rational to stay invested in the market to garner very large returns since the risk of a crash remains finite.”

Of course, the end of a bubble doesn’t always imply a crash, just a change from super exponential growth to some other kind of market dynamics.

But if Sornette’s forecasts prove reliable, the herding behaviour of traders and investors makes it seem inevitable that they will trigger crashes. If that happens, they will become self-fulfilling prophecies that will generate some interesting dilemmas for traders and regulators alike.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0909.1007: Bubble Diagnosis and Prediction of the 2005-2007 and 2008-2009 Chinese stock market bubbles

Keep Reading

Most Popular

Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.

And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.

How scientists traced a mysterious covid case back to six toilets

When wastewater surveillance turns into a hunt for a single infected individual, the ethics get tricky.

The problem with plug-in hybrids? Their drivers.

Plug-in hybrids are often sold as a transition to EVs, but new data from Europe shows we’re still underestimating the emissions they produce.

It’s time to retire the term “user”

The proliferation of AI means we need a new word.

Stay connected

Illustration by Rose Wong

Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Explore more newsletters

It looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.