Hello,

We noticed you're browsing in private or incognito mode.

To continue reading this article, please exit incognito mode or log in.

Not an Insider? Subscribe now for unlimited access to online articles.

A View from Brad King

Electronic Voting Casts Shadow over Elections

There are no hanging chads or Supreme Court challenges looming (yet). But the nation isn’t satisfied with electronic voting machines.

  • November 8, 2006

Last night’s election was one of the most hotly contested midterm elections in recent memory. Millions raced to the polls, casting votes that eventually overthrew the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives and left its hold on the Senate in jeopardy.

Despite the feel-good voting hangover many Americans have this morning, not everyone is convinced that our current system–now made up largely of electronic voting machines–serves our republic well.

The main culprit: distrust in electronic voting machines.

There were numerous reports from polling stations around the country concerning glitches with the e-voting machines. While most of the reports indicated that the glitches happened during the first hours the polls were open, the cascade effect was that lines got longer throughout the day.

Some attributed this to the newly installed machines, since nearly one-third of all e-voting systems were installed for this election.

That the new machines hiccupped, though, provides just enough ammunition for people who believe these “technological abacuses” are unreliable. Just north of my home in Kentucky, this was evident. Throughout the day, the news in Ohio–the state at the heart of the controversial 2004 presidential election–focused on the potential for voter fraud.

And maybe that wasn’t such a bad idea. After all, election officials reported hundreds of calls about problems with e-voting machines. From Forbes:

By early afternoon the hotline had received over 500 calls reporting problems in Ohio alone, according to coordinating lawyer Jennifer Scullion.

As more glitches popped up around the country, nervous editorial boards began calling for yet another overhaul of the vote-counting system, claiming that doubt sowed by e-voting machines undermines our democracy. From the Houston Chronicle:

The right to a free and fair vote is the essence of a functioning democracy. The confusion evident Tuesday calls out for continued improvement. Every electronic machine should produce a backup paper trail. Provisional paper ballots should be on hand in case the entire system goes down. Alternatives such as Oregon’s system of mail-in ballots also should be considered.

Other news sources, such as Wired News, are calling for a more rational “debugging” approach to the election. Find the problems, address them, and build a better voting machine.

AI is here. Will you lead or follow?
Join us at EmTech Digital 2019.

Register now
Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Insider Basic.
  • Insider Basic {! insider.prices.basic !}*

    {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

    Six issues of our award winning print magazine, unlimited online access plus The Download with the top tech stories delivered daily to your inbox.

    See details+

    Print Magazine (6 bi-monthly issues)

    Unlimited online access including all articles, multimedia, and more

    The Download newsletter with top tech stories delivered daily to your inbox

/3
You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. This is your last free article this month. for unlimited online access. You've read all your free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for more, or for unlimited online access. for two more free articles, or for unlimited online access.