'Web 2.0' Has Arrived
It’s unstoppable, say the digerati in San Francisco this week: Users are taking over the Web.
A standing-room-only crowd of 800 entrepreneurs, executives, software developers, and journalists were in attendance on Wednesday, October 6, as O’Reilly Media CEO Tim O’Reilly and former Industry Standard editor-in-chief John Battelle kicked off the second annual Web 2.0 conference in San Francisco.
At least in the two tech gurus’ minds, “Web 2.0” stands for the idea that the Internet is evolving from a collection of static pages into a vehicle for software services, especially those that foster self-publishing, participation, and collaboration. (See O’Reilly’s recent essay, ‘What is Web 2.0?’).
User-centered Web phenomena such as blogging, community photo-sharing (exemplified by Flickr), collective editing (Wikipedia), and social bookmarking (Delicious), they argue, are disrupting traditional ideas about how software is built and how information is generated, shared, and distributed on the Internet.
With almost half a million Wikipedians contributing and editing articles, 90 million people running the open-source Mozilla Firefox browser, and 18.9 million people now publishing blogs (according to blog search engine Technorati), the case goes, it’s hard to dispute that users’ attention is gradually shifting away from the products of traditional publishers, media companies, and software makers.
A year ago, this was a provocative argument. Big software and Web companies like Microsoft and Yahoo seemed far from embracing the transformation O’Reilly and Battelle perceived.
The news this time around is that after a year of observation and experimentation, many of the same companies are jumping into the game unreservedly – either by acquiring smaller companies exemplifying “Web 2.0” principles or building their own Web-based communities and services.
“Last year we made the argument that, to use a phrase coined by Sun Microsystems, ‘the network is the computer,’” O’Reilly said. “Now we’re starting to see real evidence of that.”
For perhaps the biggest example, Yahoo has spent the past six months trumpeting its enthusiasm for community and user-generated content. In March 2005, the company launched a blogging and content-sharing system called Yahoo! 360 and simultaneously acquired Flickr, where people upload their photographs and share them with friends – and strangers – by tagging them with keywords that make them easier to find.
“We think the big change on the Internet is not just about getting more and more unique users, but, as we go forward, it’s all about deeper engagement,” said Yahoo CEO Terry Semel during a Thursday morning interview with Battelle.
He pointed to Flickr and to the user reviews and ratings on Yahoo! Local as examples of services that hinge on user participation. “You’ll see many more examples in the next 6-12 months,” Semel said. “All of our content is starting to be on platforms that take advantage of community.”
Microsoft, where PC-based operating systems and productivity software are still the main source of revenue, is also catching the Web 2.0 wave. Microsoft executives who took the stage Wednesday evening admitted that the company’s recent reorganization was devised in part to adapt to the new importance of Web-based services.
“Almost every aspect of what we’re trying to do is changing in some way, shape, or form,” said Ray Ozzie, who’s famous in the software world for developing Lotus Notes and was recently named Microsoft’s newest chief technology officer.
Even basic desktop-software products such as Excel and Word, Ozzie said, would eventually take on many of the characteristics of today’s browser-based Web services. The company’s software will undergo “a steady migration” toward “user experiences using browsers, or using Internet-based services that are not running in the browser,” he said.
“If it takes very seamlessly weaving together software, hardware, and services in order to accomplish that experience, that’s what you’re going to find us doing,” Ozzie said.
Not everyone on stage at Web 2.0 bought into the idea, though, that browser-based software and user-generated content will rule the Web. Barry Diller, CEO of IAC/Interactive Corp. – which recently acquired the fourth-ranked search engine Ask Jeeves – had some stinging skepticism ready when Battelle asked him whether content such as blogs, photos, and videos would eventually overshadow big-media offerings on the Web.
“There may be audiences of eight to 12 people interested in somebody’s individual expressions, and more than that in some cases,” Diller replied. “But the truth is, that’s where editorship comes in. A process with people who have talent and expertise at making entertainment products is not going to be displaced by 18 million people coming up with their videos that are only entertaining because they’re awkward and stupid.”
Not every blogger can be a William Faulkner or an F. Scott Fitzgerald, of course, and many Internet fads burn out as quickly as they flame to life. What’s more, it’s standard practice for marketers to slap the “2.0” label on a product after even the most trivial upgrades.
But “Web 2.0” is one buzzword that seems to be sticking. Indeed, a Google search on it generates about 12.5 million citations. The phrase is now used daily by thousands of bloggers, entrepreneurs, and others to describe almost any change that makes the Web more interactive or participatory or upsets the business models of traditional software makers or entertainment companies.
Tim O’Reilly, founder of the Sebastopol, CA-based tech publishing house, has been using “Web 2.0” since mid-2004 to describe the evolution of the Web into a delivery mechanism for a range of media and software services – even programs that take over the typical duties of desktop software, such as e-mail and word processing.
The second Web 2.0 conference is clearly reaping the benefits of that buzz. With some 800 attendees squeezed into San Francisco’s Argent Hotel for the limited-registration meeting, it was about 100 more than last year, according to O’Reilly Media.
Many were managers and developers from small, recently-launched Web 2.0 startups, such as Bunchball, Flock, Joyent, Rollyo, Wink, and Zimbra. Because the software components behind the new generation of Web-based services are typically remixable, reusable, and open-source, it’s possible to assemble innovative services quickly and cheaply, Battelle and O’Reilly pointed out. Said Battelle, “People can start an interesting company with just a few people and not that much money.”
Become an MIT Technology Review Insider for in-depth analysis and unparalleled perspective.Subscribe today