Hello,

We noticed you're browsing in private or incognito mode.

To continue reading this article, please exit incognito mode or log in.

Not an Insider? Subscribe now for unlimited access to online articles.

A View from Mike Bloxham

Usability Meets TV Advertising?

There are opposing views on the extent to which interactivity is really going to become a part of our day-to-day TV viewing. Predictably there are equally committed zealots at either end of the conversational spectrum either dismissing the notion completely…

  • January 3, 2005

There are opposing views on the extent to which interactivity is really going to become a part of our day-to-day TV viewing. Predictably there are equally committed zealots at either end of the conversational spectrum either dismissing the notion completely or declaring interactivity an inevitability waiting to happen.

The reality is of course, likely to be somewhere in the middle, with some programs and some advertising offering different types of interactivity that different audience segments will take advantage of on different occasions (the trick lies in defining where the money is in all this).

Experience from overseas (notably the UK) and some activity here in the US suggests that as far as interactive advertising is concerned, creatives are going to have a whole new dimension to deal with. Issues of effectiveness and accountability have always been the source of tension between the creative and client side of the advertising equation, but when a 30-second spot has to not only effectively communicate a message or call to action, but also facilitate some sort of direct on-screen interaction, the evil specter of usability raises its (to some) ugly head.

After all, if a viewer is sufficiently moved to interact with an ad (and, yes it does happen), then its kind of important that the interface design is conducive to making it happen.

This isnt only relevant to direct response ads either. Interactive ads (or iAds as they are often called) have demonstrated a real ability to impact against branding metrics too, as consumers become more immersed in an advertiser-supplied experience. Its at this point where the usability of the interface is a very real part of how the brand communicates itself.

In the future then, look for ad copy testing to evolve to include usability testing to determine how much and which parts of the screen are utilized for which purpose. Getting it right can lead to more time spent with the brand, enhanced consumer response and data captured through requests for information, competition entries etc. Getting it wrong could end up with otherwise perfectly good advertising leaving a bad taste in the consumers mouth

Want more award-winning journalism? Subscribe to Insider Plus.
  • Insider Plus {! insider.prices.plus !}*

    {! insider.display.menuOptionsLabel !}

    Everything included in Insider Basic, plus the digital magazine, extensive archive, ad-free web experience, and discounts to partner offerings and MIT Technology Review events.

    See details+

    Print + Digital Magazine (6 bi-monthly issues)

    Unlimited online access including all articles, multimedia, and more

    The Download newsletter with top tech stories delivered daily to your inbox

    Technology Review PDF magazine archive, including articles, images, and covers dating back to 1899

    10% Discount to MIT Technology Review events and MIT Press

    Ad-free website experience

/3
You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for unlimited online access. This is your last free article this month. for unlimited online access. You've read all your free articles this month. for unlimited online access. You've read of three free articles this month. for more, or for unlimited online access. for two more free articles, or for unlimited online access.