Asking Bush and Kerry About Science
Nature magazine has a nifty site posing 15 questions to the two major presidential candidates on an array of scientific and technological topics, including stem cells, nuclear fusion, space exploration, and mad cow disease. Unfortunately, many of the answers are disappointingly short and boilerplate. John Kerry misses a significant chance to differentiate himself from President Bush’s overpoliticized scientific panels by punting on the question about how he would ensure that his administration receives impartial scientific advice (question 2). And Bush repeats his canard that reducing greenhouse gas intensity does anything about climate change (question 12). Kerry deservedly attacks Bush on missile defense (question 5), saying that in its rush to deploy a system rather than continuing research, development, and testing, the administration “has shredded its own credibility” on this issue. And as blogger Chris Mooney points out, neither Bush nor Kerry apparently thinks there is any point beyond which genetic modification of plants and animals should be pursued (question 11).
Science magazine does a better job with its own presidential Q&As (PDF). Even when the questions are the same as Nature’s, the candidates’ answers are somewhat more developed. Start here if you only have time to read one or the other.
Keep Reading
Most Popular
Large language models can do jaw-dropping things. But nobody knows exactly why.
And that's a problem. Figuring it out is one of the biggest scientific puzzles of our time and a crucial step towards controlling more powerful future models.
OpenAI teases an amazing new generative video model called Sora
The firm is sharing Sora with a small group of safety testers but the rest of us will have to wait to learn more.
Google’s Gemini is now in everything. Here’s how you can try it out.
Gmail, Docs, and more will now come with Gemini baked in. But Europeans will have to wait before they can download the app.
This baby with a head camera helped teach an AI how kids learn language
A neural network trained on the experiences of a single young child managed to learn one of the core components of language: how to match words to the objects they represent.
Stay connected
Get the latest updates from
MIT Technology Review
Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.